ARTICLE
15 September 2020

Where States Stand On Lost Wage Assistance One Month Later

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
A shade over a month ago, the Trump Administration issued a presidential memorandum authorizing lost wages assistance ("LWA") as a stop-gap...
United States Employment and HR

A shade over a month ago, the Trump Administration issued a presidential memorandum authorizing lost wages assistance ("LWA") as a stop-gap measure for a congressional impasse on further supplemental unemployment benefits. We previously wrote an alert discussing the LWA order, its likely benefits and implementation time, and potential legal challenges to the order, followed by another alert discussing guidance issued by the Department of Labor ("DOL") and the Federal Emergency Management Authority ("FEMA"). This alert builds on our prior updates by discussing the status of LWA grants and the status of negotiations on additional unemployment benefits.

As of September 9, 2020, every state except for South Dakota has applied for a LWA grant. South Dakota previously stated that it does not intend to apply for LWA and, with one day remaining in the time to apply, appears to have stuck to its position.

And, of the 49 states that have applied for LWA grants, 13 have begun disbursing LWA payments. We have identified those states, the amount of available weeks of LWA, when the state began disbursing LWA, and whether the LWA includes an additional $100 payment from state funds in the below summary:

 

State Payment Status Weeks Approved Additional $100?
Alabama Paid beginning 9/3 4 weeks -
Arizona Paid beginning 8/17 5 weeks -
California Paid beginning 9/3 5 weeks -
Florida Paid beginning 9/8 3 weeks -
Iowa Paid beginning 9/4 5 weeks -
Louisiana Paid beginning 8/26 5 weeks -
Massachusetts Paid beginning 9/5 3 weeks -
Minnesota Paid beginning 9/4 5 weeks -
Missouri Paid beginning 8/26 3 weeks -
Montana Paid beginning 8/27 3 weeks Yes
North Carolina Paid beginning 9/3 3 weeks -
Tennessee Paid beginning 9/3 3 weeks -
Texas Paid beginning 8/27 6 weeks -

The remaining states are roughly equally divided between projecting a disbursement date in the next two weeks versus providing no estimate on disbursement. In addition to Montana, Kansas, Kentucky, and West Virginia have opted to pay an additional $100 in state-funded LWA, raising the payment in those states from $300 to $400.

One large unknown is when FEMA will have disbursed all available funding from the Disaster Relief Fund, the funding mechanism for LWA payments. Most sources estimated that LWA funds would be exhausted after about six weeks of LWA payments, and we should have a better idea about how long funding will be available in the next few days, after FEMA releases its monthly report on the status of the Disaster Relief Fund.

What comes after the LWA program expires remains an open question. The prospects for immediate future unemployment benefits are not high. On Thursday, September 10, the Senate was unable to advance a bill that provided a $300 supplemental unemployment benefit through December. In the aftermath of the bill's failure, both Republicans and Democrats seemed pessimistic that they would reach a resolution before November's presidential election.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More