ARTICLE
26 March 2024

Is It A Bad Thing That ERISA Killed The Pension Plan?

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
Of Counsel Michelle Capezza spoke with Fiduciary News providing insights on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and whether it unintentionally contributed to the decline of traditional pension programs.
United States Employment and HR

Of Counsel Michelle Capezza spoke with Fiduciary News providing insights on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and whether it unintentionally contributed to the decline of traditional pension programs.

Michelle commented, "In my view, the ERISA requirements for pension plans were not enacted to phase out pension plans, but rather, they were enacted, and are necessary, to protect workers and to ensure that they would receive their promised pension benefits in retirement, a promise upon which they relied. It wouldn't make sense for an employer to sponsor a defined benefit pension plan and make promises to employees about pension benefits if they can't meet the fiduciary standards and funding requirements for the plan, as well as all of the other ERISA and tax code requirements that go along with it."

SOURCE

Fiduciary News

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More