ARTICLE
13 August 2020

EEOC Resumes Issuance Of Charge Closure Documents

DW
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Contributor

Dickinson Wright PLLC, founded in 1878, is a full-service business law firm with 550+ lawyers across the United States and Canada, covering over 40 practice areas and industry groups. Headquartered in Detroit, the firm provides practical, business-focused legal solutions and invests in technology and personnel to support efficient, innovative service delivery. Dickinson Wright maintains independently verified information security and risk management controls, including ISO/IEC 27701:2019 certification, reflecting a commitment to protecting sensitive client matters. The firm handles complex transactions and high-stakes litigation and is regularly recognized by leading legal industry organizations for the quality of its work.
On August 3, 2020, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it will resume issuing charge closure documents
United States Employment and HR
Dickinson Wright PLLC are most popular:
  • within Insurance and Law Department Performance topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Healthcare industries

On August 3, 2020, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it will resume issuing charge closure documents.  The EEOC had suspended issuing charge closure documents on March 21, 2020 due to the pandemic, unless a charging party requested closing charge documents be issued.  Although the EEOC has continued to investigate cases, accept charges, and otherwise attempt to enforce the nation's Federal discrimination laws during the pandemic, it had not been issuing charge closure documents, until now.

Why is This Significant for Employers?

One of the charge closure documents issued by the EEOC is a Notice of Right to Sue, which is a document a charging party must have to file a lawsuit in Federal court alleging discrimination or retaliation.  The charging party has 90 days to file a lawsuit in Federal court after receiving the Notice of Right to Sue.  This administrative timeframe is strictly enforced and thus, kicks off a charging party's right to go to court and file a federal or state lawsuit (in those states that require it as discussed below). Failure to file the related lawsuit within 90 days after receipt of the Notice of Right to Sue, however, blocks a charging party from proceeding with such claims in federal court.

State Time Limits May Be More Generous

The failure to file in Federal court within 90 days of the EEOC's issuance of a Notice of Right to Sue may not totally preclude a charging party from filing a lawsuit against an employer as many state discrimination statutes allow more time for employees to file discrimination and related state claims. In some states, it is also not an initial requirement that an employee go through the administrative process before filing suit in state court. For example, Michigan's discrimination statute, the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA), has a three-year statute of limitations from the date of the alleged act of discrimination and an employee does not first have to exhaust federal administrative remedies before proceeding with a discrimination or retaliation claim under the ELCRA.

However, any employer that has a charge filed with the EEOC filed against it, or suspects that there may be a discrimination claim that could be presented, should be aware of the fact that the EEOC's resumption of issuance of Notices of Right to Sue will trigger the 90 day filing period, which could serve as a defense to a Federal court lawsuit over a discrimination claim.

Employers with questions or concerns about this issue should feel free to contact us or one of the members of our Firm's Labor and Employment Department to determine how this EEOC announcement may affect them.

Originally published August 12, 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More