ARTICLE
12 October 2022

Noh Comments On SCOTUS Warhol Case

PC
Pryor Cashman LLP

Contributor

A premier, midsized law firm headquartered in New York City, Pryor Cashman boasts nearly 180 attorneys and offices in both Los Angeles and Miami. From every office, we are known for getting the job done right, and doing it with integrity, efficiency and élan.
Pryor Cashman Partner Megan Noh, who co-chairs the firm's Art Law Group, talked with Reuters about the U.S. Supreme Court case Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith...
United States Intellectual Property

Pryor Cashman Partner Megan Noh, who co-chairs the firm's Art Law Group, talked with Reuters about the U.S. Supreme Court case Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, which looks at whether or not artist Andy Warhol had a fair use claim when he used a photo of musician Prince in an artwork.

In "U.S. Supreme Court mulls line between art and theft in Warhol case," reporter Blake Brittain spoke with several legal experts ahead of the Court's October 12, 2022, oral arguments that will center "on how courts decide when an artist makes 'fair use' of another's work under copyright law. The dispute over the legal boundary between inspiration and misuse has drawn broad interest for its implications for artists."

Megan told Reuters that she "hopes the Supreme Court will clarify how courts determine when a work is transformative and how much weight this should receive compared to other considerations."

Read the full article using the link below.

Resources

Originally published by Reuters

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More