Exclusive Rights, Episode 3 —Understanding The SCOTUS Fair Use Decision In Google v. Oracle (Podcast)

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.

Explore Firm Details

Does Google's Android API infringe Oracle's copyright in its Java API? That's the question the Supreme Court was asked to deal with in Google v. Oracle recently...

United States Intellectual Property

The Mintz Levin Public Finance Group

Your Author LinkedIn Connections

Does Google's Android API infringe Oracle's copyright in its Java API? That's the question the Supreme Court was asked to deal with in Google v. Oracle recently. In this episode of the EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS: Intellectual Property podcast, Mintz IP attorneys Todd B. Buck, PhD and Michael R. Graif dive into the Court's decision regarding Google's copying of 11,500 lines of "declaring" code from Oracle's Java API.

Their informative discussion covers a number of pertinent questions:

Software is expressly protected under the Copyright Act insofar as it is a set of instructions that directly or indirectly bring about a certain result. So how is it okay for Google to copy this code?
The Supreme Court decided that Google's copying was fair use without addressing copyrightability. How did that affect the Court's fair use analysis?
Unlike the 2.5 million lines of "implementing code," which Google rewrote, the "declaring" code that Google copied contained the commands that Java programmers knew from writing programs for laptops and desktops. How can copying code to encourage further development for smartphones be a "transformative" use?
Oracle tried and failed to develop a platform for Java programmers to write apps for smartphones. Google succeeded with Android. Does that mean Google's copying had no "market effect" on Oracle?
Is this decision good for start-ups? What about established software providers? What about open source software? How will this ruling impact software programming going forward?

For a breakdown of the complex legal considerations and technical issues addressed in the Google ruling, click on the link below to listen to the podcast.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Authors

The Mintz Levin Public Finance Group

Your Author LinkedIn Connections

See More Popular Content From

Exclusive Rights, Episode 3 —Understanding The SCOTUS Fair Use Decision In Google v. Oracle (Podcast)

Contributor

Intellectual Property

Contributor

United States