ARTICLE
28 July 2026

Louisiana Public Entities Can No Longer Withhold Contested Liquidated Damages

JW
Jones Walker

Contributor

At Jones Walker, we look beyond today’s challenges and focus on the opportunities of the future. Since our founding in May 1937 by Joseph Merrick Jones, Sr., and Tulane Law School graduates William B. Dreux and A.J. Waechter, we have consistently asked ourselves a simple question: What can we do to help our clients succeed, today and tomorrow?
Louisiana Act 255 fundamentally shifts the leverage dynamic on public construction projects by prohibiting owners from withholding payment over disputed liquidated damages. Under the new law, public entities must pay contractors first and pursue delay claims through separate litigation, with significant financial consequences including attorney fee recovery and daily interest penalties for both parties. How will this statutory codification of prior court rulings reshape payment practices and dispute resolut
United States Louisiana Real Estate and Construction
Christopher D. Cazenave’s articles from Jones Walker are most popular:
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Retail & Leisure industries
Jones Walker are most popular:
  • within Government, Public Sector, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration and Criminal Law topic(s)

Act 255 changed Louisiana’s public prompt-payment rules, and on public projects it changes the balance of leverage in a real way. It took effect May 15, 2026.

The core change: A public owner can no longer hold back liquidated damages the contractor disputes. If the owner believes it is owed delay damages, it has to pay the contractor first and pursue the claim in a separate lawsuit. The one exception is narrow — flood protection and integrated coastal projects — and it opens only after the standard 45-day payment window closes.

This is less a reversal than a codification. Louisiana courts had previously ruled that a public entity could not sit on a contractor’s retainage over an unproven delay claim, and that a contract clause purporting to allow it did not override the duty to pay. Act 255 now writes that into the statute and names contested liquidated damages directly, so the outcome no longer turns on how a court may read the older law.

Three features give teeth to Louisiana Act 255:

  1. Loser pays on the damages fight. Whoever prevails on the liquidated-damages claim recovers attorney fees.
  2. Interest cuts back toward the owner. An owner who pays a contested amount and later wins it back collects interest — half a percent a day, capped at 15 percent — from the date it paid. That mirrors the penalty that owners have long faced for paying late.
  3. The payment-enforcement remedy runs both ways. A contractor forcing payment recovers fees and interest; if the owner wins that fight instead, the contractor owes the owner’s fees. And the delay-damages claim cannot be pulled into that expedited proceeding at all.

Bottom line: Contractors holding receivables against an open delay assessment should revisit them now, and public owners should treat liquidated damages as a claim to prove in court, not a reason to withhold.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More