ARTICLE
14 June 2016

Market Abuse Regulation - The Impact On AIM Companies

F
Fieldfisher

Contributor

Fieldfisher  logo

Fieldfisher is a European law firm known for its market-leading practices in technology, financial services, energy, and life sciences. With a focus on client collaboration, innovation, and social responsibility, the firm integrates cutting-edge legal technologies and provides tailored solutions. Fieldfisher’s global presence spans Europe, the US, China, and international partner firms, allowing seamless cross-border services. Recognized for excellence, Fieldfisher holds high rankings in dispute resolution, M&A, and IP, and has a strong commitment to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) leadership. The firm operates with over 1,800 professionals across 23 offices in 12 countries.

The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) comes into force and effect on 3 July 2016, replacing the existing market abuse regime.
United Kingdom Corporate/Commercial Law

The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) comes into force and effect on 3 July 2016, replacing the existing market abuse regime. The new regime would survive (at least for a period) a Brexit vote later this month should that occur, so it is important that all AIM companies are aware of the impact and consequences of MAR.

Although some of the changes are quite subtle, there are a few key changes that are likely to impact AIM companies which are summarised below.

Dealings by persons discharging managerial responsibilities (PDMRs)

  • Various new rules regarding disclosure and dealings during close periods
  • AIM companies must have a share dealing code
  • A broader application, as not just directors of AIM companies will be covered
  • New close periods of different durations to current periods

Action:

  • Ensure suitable processes are in place
  • Adopt or revise the share dealing code
  • Identify PDMRs
  • Train PDMRs on the new regime and processes

Inside Information

  • Existing AIM rules on disclosure are likely to remain but to sit alongside similar, but not identical, disclosure obligations under MAR
  • New MAR rules (similar but not identical to the existing AIM rules) regarding the delay of disclosure of inside information
  • New requirement to keep insider lists, in a prescribed format

Action:

  • Ensure suitable procedures are in place
  • Prepare an insider policy and prepare insider lists in the required format
  • Consider establishing a committee to handle the dissemination and delay of disclosure of inside information

Market Soundings (e.g. in relation to possible fundraisings, transactions etc.)

  • New rules regarding the disclosure of information in relation to possible fundraisings, transactions etc
  • New rules on record keeping of disclosures

Action:

  • Train any employees who are involved in market soundings
  • Ensure record keeping procedures are in place

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More