ARTICLE
30 October 2024

Stronger Than Water? – The Higher Regional Court Of Koblenz Rules On Advertising With The Designation 'IMMUN WATER'

MJ
Maucher Jenkins

Contributor

Maucher Jenkins is an Anglo-German firm of patent and trade mark attorneys, attorneys at law and intellectual property litigators. With offices in the UK, Germany, Switzerland and China we act for clients setting the pace in engineering, software, life sciences, consumer products, the media and innovative product design.
The Higher Regional Court of Koblenz prohibited Eckes-Granini from marketing "Hohes C Immun Water" due to misleading health claims, citing EU regulations. The court ruled that "Immun Water" suggests unverified immune benefits, which violates authorized health claim standards.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property

The Higher Regional Court of Koblenz has prohibited Eckes-Granini from advertising the beverage 'Hohes C Immun Water' using the designation 'IMMUN WATER'. The lawsuit was filed by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv), which argued that the name suggests that the beverage strengthens the immune system – without any scientific basis or approval for this. The drink 'hohes C IMMUN WATER' was launched in spring 2022.

1537298a.jpg

© 2024 Eckes-Granini Germany (source: https://www.hohesc.de/products/functional-water/immun-water)

The name 'Hohes C Immun Water' had already been registered as a word mark DE 302021117355 by the German Patent and Trade Mark Office in January 2022. The bottle advertised in large letters with the name 'IMMUN WATER' and smaller references to the content of vitamin C and D, which are said to contribute to the normal functioning of the immune system. The vzbv considered this to be misleading health advertising, as it suggested a direct impact of the drink on the immune system without any scientific evidence to support this claim.

Court decision:

The Higher Regional Court of Koblenz ruled that the product name could be understood as a health claim, which is inadmissible under the EU Health Claims Regulation because it has not been authorised. The name 'IMMUN WATER' suggests a direct positive effect on the immune system, which, in the opinion of the court, has not been proven.

Judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Koblenz of 4 June 2024, Az. 9 U 1314/23 – not legally binding.

The appeal to the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) was not admitted. An appeal against the denial of leave to appeal was filed. The judgment is therefore not yet legally binding. It remains to be seen whether the Federal Court of Justice will come to a different conclusion here. After all, the ECJ has in the past ruled that describing a wine as 'digestible' is a violation of the EU Health Claims Regulation (ECJ, judgment of 6 September 2012, case C-544/10).

Problems with health claims: the Maucher Jenkins team will be happy to advise you.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More