ARTICLE
7 September 2024

UK Cryptoasset Firms And Sanctions Reporting

G
Gherson

Contributor

Founded in 1988 by Roger Gherson, Gherson Solicitors LLP was first established as a boutique immigration law firm based in London. Now servicing clients across all areas of immigration, international protection and human rights, white collar crime, sanctions, and civil litigation and arbitration, Gherson LLP’s offices continue to expand across Europe.

With over 35 years of experience, Gherson’s expertise extends from meeting the migration needs of international business people and UK-based companies to litigation in all UK jurisdictions and the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.

Firms providing cryptoasset exchange and custodial services must report suspected sanctions breaches and comply with UK sanctions reporting obligations. HM Treasury's updated guidance includes these firms as "relevant"...
United Kingdom Technology

Do firms providing cryptoasset exchange and custodial services have to report suspected sanctions breaches?

Yes, firms providing services of cryptoasset exchanges and cryptoasset custodians must report suspected sanctions breaches, as well as comply with additional sanctions reporting requirements.

Background

Previously, all relevant firms have been subject to UK sanctions reporting obligations. These obligations include reporting awareness of a person or entity subject to financial sanctions and reporting any breach of the sanctions regulations that occurs in the course of business.

30 August 2022 Updated Guidance

HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation's ("OFSI") 30 August 2022 Guidance "Reporting information to OFSI – what to do" confirms that the definition of relevant firms includes a cryptoasset exchange provider and a custodian wallet provider.

As such, firms offering the services of cryptoasset exchange providers and custodian wallet providers must comply with UK sanctions reporting obligations.

What are the reporting requirements?

Relevant firms are required to inform OFSI as soon as possible if they know or reasonably suspect a person who may be a designated person, or who may have committed an offence under financial sanctions regulations. The reporting obligation applies where the information has been received by the relevant firm in the course of carrying out their business.

In addition, relevant firms are required to report to OFSI the nature and amount or quantity of any funds or economic resources that they hold for a customer who is a designated person.

Failure to notify OFSI is an offence and could result in a penalty.

Reporting to OFSI is done via the compliance reporting form. OFSI has published detailed guidance "Reporting information to OFSI – what to do".

UK crypto sanctions compliance

Gherson's criminal litigation, investigations and regulatory team have also recently written about how to address the risk of sanctions evasion via cryptoassets.

This followed an 11 March 2022 joint statement reiterating that all UK financial services firms are expected to play their part in ensuring that sanctions are complied with. That includes firms in the cryptoasset sector.

This statement additionally served as a timely reminder that financial sanctions regulations do not differentiate between cryptoassets and other forms of assets. Therefore, the use of cryptoassets to circumvent economic sanctions is a criminal offence under the Money Laundering Regulations ("MLRs") and regulations made under the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018.

Indeed, the use of technology to obfuscate transactions is one of the following red flags suggesting an increased risk of sanctions evasion according to the statement:

  • Customers who are located or conducting business to or from a jurisdiction subject to sanctions, or which is on the UK's High Risk Third Country list;
  • Transactions to or from a wallet address associated with a sanctioned entity, or a high-risk wallet address;
  • Transactions involving a cryptoasset exchange or custodian wallet provider known to have poor customer due diligence procedures or otherwise high risk; and
  • The use of tools to obfuscate the location of the customer.

Sanctioning of smart contract Tornado Cash

The team have also previously written a blog entitled "Can a smart contract be sanctioned" about the 8 August 2022 decision of the U.S.Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control to sanction virtual currency mixer Tornado Cash.

Conclusion

With the crypto sector becoming more and more integrated into the financial sector it is not surprising to find out that increased regulatory and compliance obligations are being imposed.

Implementing systems and controls to ensure compliance with these additional obligations can often be a burdensome and technical task.

Those working in the compliance of this sector will need to keep a keen ear to any developments and ensure that all systems and controls are up-to-speed.

Regulation and compliance

In these constantly changing times, firms that deal with cryptoassets will need to carefully consider all their systems and controls to ensure that they are able to comply with all relevant AML and sanctions regulations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More