ARTICLE
24 October 2013

Marry In Haste… Why The Law On Capacity To Marry Needs To Be Reformed

WB
Wedlake Bell

Contributor

We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future. With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution. Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic. Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
When a person loses mental capacity, they cannot legally make certain decisions and this can include lifestyle decisions such as who to live with, and whether to marry.
United Kingdom Family and Matrimonial

When a person loses mental capacity, they cannot legally make certain decisions and this can include lifestyle decisions such as who to live with, and whether to marry. In PC and NC v City of York Council [2013] EWCA Civ 478, a woman with learning difficulties wanted to live with her husband who had a previous conviction for sexual offences, and the court had to determine whether she had capacity to make this decision herself. The legal test for capacity to cohabit was analysed and the court accepted that it be updated so as to take into account the personal characteristics of the proposed cohabitee. In this case, notwithstanding the man's previous convictions, the court decided that the woman had capacity to make her own decision.

As the law stands, however, the legal test for capacity to marry does not take into account the personal characteristics of the proposed spouse, only whether the person in question understands the general nature of marriage. This could result in a decision that does not adequately protect the vulnerable person concerned.

In this article which first appeared in the September 2013 edition of PS Magazine, the magazine of the Law Society's Private Client Section (www.lawsociety.org.uk/privateclient), partner Ann Stanyer and senior associate Victoria Mahon de Palacios discuss the York case and why the law on capacity to marry should be reformed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More