ARTICLE
4 November 2024

That Could Have Been A Lot Worse: Thoughts On Rachel Reeves' First Budget As Chancellor

HL
Humphreys Law

Contributor

We are a focused, full-service law firm advising clients in the technology and media sectors.

Our lawyers have decades of combined experience advising on transactions, projects and disputes.

We pride ourselves on providing pragmatic, crystal-clear advice rooted in the context of the underlying commercials.

A great deal of what we do has an international dimension.

Rather than operating overseas branch offices, we maintain informal relationships with similarly-independent overseas firms in all the major jurisdictions and beyond.

We have a small office in Brussels and in Dublin so that our lawyers who are dual qualified in England & Wales and then Ireland and/or Belgium can have post-Brexit access to the European Courts.

Last Wednesday new Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered her first budget and the first Labour Party budget for 14 years.
United Kingdom Tax

Last Wednesday new Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered her first budget and the first Labour Party budget for 14 years. Speculation as to the taxation, borrowing and spending measures that would be in the budget had been much discussed in the prior election campaign and had been the subject of febrile speculation ever since Labour came to power in July. Our Managing Partner Henry Humphreys gave his personal thoughts on LinkedIn in the hours after the budget was delivered, and those are now reproduced in the same form below.

"1. That could have been a lot worse. Predictions in various quarters were that it would be. Not everyone is patient enough to wait for the detail. In M&A and PE circles, the fear was that capital gains tax would go up to the marginal rate of income tax (45%). It hasn't and the UK remains competitive compared to certain of the major EU jurisdictions in particular (30% flat rate in France; 26.375% in Germany; Nordics in the 30%s). The large gap between the marginal rates of income tax and capital gains tax continues and to that extent entrepreneurs are rewarded for taking the risk required to build businesses.

2. The rate of tax on that £1 million lifetime allowance for entrepreneurs (currently 10%) is going up in 2025 (14% / an extra £40k on the full million) and again in 2026 (18%, so £80k extra on today's rate). So, the allowance is to be chipped away a bit, but it's still up to a million quid at that lower rate. You don't get that as an employee paying income tax.

3. UK plc's slow growth rate is alarming (and unsurprising) and is vastly outstripped by inflation, even if the later is now somewhat controlled (although Covid era prices won't go down again). Until growth improves, governments are going to keep needing to raise taxes to pay the bills. Reeves and Starmer have – as announced in advance – changed the borrowing rules (and the way in which debt appears on the UK balance sheet) so as to invest. But there was almost nothing on the key threshold question of how they are going to spark growth in the economy, with the spending measures focused on patching up our neglected NHS and schools. What seems impossible to discuss at a political level is that there is the most unique treasure trove of data within the NHS that could be anonymized and monetised for the public good – nowhere else in the world does this exist, and yet as a nation we seem unable to take advantage or to even discuss the point (having years ago somewhat blindly handed over our – non-anonymised – personal data to the big tech companies anyway).

4. The increase in employers' national insurance from 13.8% to 15% will hurt employers but is doing a lot of work amongst the tax raising measures in this budget aiming to fill that black hole in the UK's P&L. With AI at perhaps the tipping point of going mainstream in most businesses' tech stack, perhaps this is the point at which the tide of near 100% employment starts to recede.

5. There are no changes to the SEIS, EIS and VCT regimes. Holdings of qualifying shares are now proportionately more valuable since there is still no capital gains tax at all on disposals made after the three year holding period. Sadly, founders of tech companies usually hold too many shares upon issuance to qualify (more than 30%) and yet the cruel irony is that many will be diluted down well below that percentage by the time they get to exit."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More