ARTICLE
14 July 2025

CMA's Probe Into Ticketmaster's Pricing Practices Rumbles On

LS
Lewis Silkin

Contributor

We have two things at our core: people – both ours and yours - and a focus on creativity, technology and innovation. Whether you are a fast growth start up or a large multinational business, we help you realise the potential in your people and navigate your strategic HR and legal issues, both nationally and internationally. Our award-winning employment team is one of the largest in the UK, with dedicated specialists in all areas of employment law and a track record of leading precedent setting cases on issues of the day. The team’s breadth of expertise is unrivalled and includes HR consultants as well as experts across specialisms including employment, immigration, data, tax and reward, health and safety, reputation management, dispute resolution, corporate and workplace environment.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has recently provided a detailed submission to the Business and Trade Select Committee, with a particular focus on pricing practices in the live events sector.
United Kingdom Antitrust/Competition Law

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has recently provided a detailed submission to the Business and Trade Select Committee, with a particular focus on pricing practices in the live events sector. Central to this submission is the CMA's update on its investigation into Ticketmaster's sale of tickets for the Oasis reunion UK tour, which has brought to light significant concerns about transparency and fairness in ticket pricing. We previously reported on this here.

Key findings

The CMA's investigation into Ticketmaster identified two main areas of concern:

  1. Misleading labelling of 'Platinum' tickets: Ticketmaster sold certain seated tickets as 'platinum' at nearly 2.5 times the price of equivalent standard tickets, despite these tickets offering no additional benefits and being located in the same areas as standard tickets. This practice risked misleading consumers into believing they were purchasing a superior product.
  2. Lack of transparency in 'Standing' ticket pricing: There were two categories of standing tickets at different prices, but this was not made clear to consumers. All cheaper standing tickets were sold first, and only after these were gone were the more expensive standing tickets released. Many fans, unaware of this structure, waited in long queues only to be faced with higher prices than expected.

The CMA did not, however, find evidence that Ticketmaster used real-time algorithmic pricing to adjust ticket prices based on demand during the Oasis sale.

What's the story? Spoiler alert, it is not morning glory

Following its investigation, the CMA sought voluntary undertakings from Ticketmaster to address the identified concerns. However, Ticketmaster declined to provide undertakings in the terms sought, leading to a fundamental disagreement over whether its practices breached consumer law. The CMA is now preparing for potential litigation, while remaining open to a voluntary resolution with Ticketmaster.

CMA's approach in other sectors

The CMA's submission also highlights its broader approach to pricing and competition across various sectors. The Authority generally seeks to improve the effectiveness of competition rather than directly regulate prices, except in cases where competition is not working or where there is evidence of anti-competitive practices such as price fixing or abuse of dominance.

Recent CMA work has included:

  • Market studies: Investigations into sectors such as road fuel, infant formula, and veterinary services, where concerns about high prices and lack of transparency have prompted recommendations for improved competition and clearer information for consumers.
  • Consumer protection enforcement: Action against practices like 'drip pricing' (where fees are hidden until late in the purchase process), misleading price claims, and lack of price transparency in sectors ranging from groceries to car rentals and online hotel bookings.
  • Dynamic pricing: The CMA has been examining the use of dynamic pricing across sectors, recognising that while it can sometimes benefit consumers, it can also lead to unfair outcomes if not properly explained or managed.

Takeaways

  • Transparency, transparency, transparency: You'll be sick of hearing it, but businesses must ensure that all pricing information is clear, accurate, and provided upfront. Misleading labelling or hidden pricing structures can lead to regulatory scrutiny and damage consumer trust.
  • Dynamic and personalised pricing: If using these models, businesses should be transparent (there's that word again) about how prices are set and ensure consumers understand the basis for any price differences.
  • Compliance with consumer law: The CMA is becoming increasingly proactive in enforcing consumer protection legislation, particularly with its new powers under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.
  • Monitor regulatory developments: The CMA's focus on pricing practices across sectors means businesses should keep abreast of guidance and enforcement trends to ensure ongoing compliance. We are still awaiting the outcome of the Emma Mattress case on reference pricing, so watch this space.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More