ARTICLE
7 July 2025

EC To Take Account Of The Need For "Defence Readiness" In Its Merger Control And Antitrust Enforcement

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
In the context of escalating geopolitical tensions and a growing emphasis on the EU's strategic autonomy, the EC has unveiled its "Defence Readiness Omnibus"—a package of measures...
European Union Antitrust/Competition Law

In the context of escalating geopolitical tensions and a growing emphasis on the EU's strategic autonomy, the EC has unveiled its "Defence Readiness Omnibus"—a package of measures aimed at reducing regulatory friction and mandating a shift to an EU defense-readiness mindset to facilitate up to EUR800 billion in defense investments over the next four years.

The measures cover a broad range of areas, including defense procurement, license permitting, access to financing, and environmental and chemical legislation. There is an acknowledgement that ensuring competitive defense markets is critical to delivery of innovative technology solutions as well as agile supply chains and value for money for defense budgets. However, the EC is seeking to clarify certain areas of antitrust law where it creates "disproportionate or unintended constraints on defence activities."

First, as part of the EC's ongoing review of its merger guidelines, there is a suggestion that consolidation in the industry could be positive and that the authority plans to introduce guidance specific to mergers relating to security or defense.

While security and defense considerations are generally the privilege of EU member states, the authority does retain jurisdiction over cases involving competition related to dual-use goods and is competent to review mergers in the defense sector more generally. It therefore calls for feedback on whether guidance on the interaction between member states' security and defense interests and the EC's competition assessment could be useful. It also asks how a potential balancing of interests between defense and competition objections could be undertaken.

In the omnibus, the EC confirms that it will give "adequate weight" to the changed security and defense environment. In particular, when conducting merger reviews, the EC will assess "the overall benefits from enhanced defence and security" within the EU "leading to efficiencies." The EC's commissioner for defence and space reportedly stated that the EC's rules "will not be an obstacle" for companies wishing to "unite their forces."

Second, the EC "stands ready" to provide antitrust guidance on cooperation projects in the defense sector. It anticipates that this could arise where collaboration is necessary to scale up production, where individual companies would otherwise be unable to develop or manufacture a product on their own or where defense companies wish to jointly procure raw materials.

Notably, the EC will consider any efficiencies generated such as the positive effects of defense readiness and resilience of defense supply chains.

We will keep you updated on the defense-related aspects of the EC's merger guidelines review as well as on any guidance published that clarifies how defense collaborations can stay on the right side of the law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More