ARTICLE
18 April 2016

Cold Storage Companies Froze Competition With Premature Merger Discussions

DB
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.

Contributor

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek is a leading international law firm, trusted by clients for over 150 years due to its deep engagement with their businesses and a clear understanding of their ambitions. While rooted in Dutch society, the firm offers global coverage through its network of top-tier law firms, ensuring seamless, tailored legal solutions. De Brauw’s independence enables it to choose the best partners while remaining a trusted, strategic advisor to clients worldwide.

The firm emphasizes long-term investment in both its client relationships and its people. De Brauw’s legal training institutes, De Brauwerij and The Brewery, cultivate diverse talent, preparing the next generation of top-tier lawyers through rigorous training and personal development. Senior leadership traditionally rises from within, maintaining the firm’s high standards and collaborative culture.

The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets imposed a fine of EUR 12.5 million on four companies in the cold storage industry.
Netherlands Antitrust/Competition Law

The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets imposed a fine of EUR 12.5 million on four companies in the cold storage industry. Two of them had been "too open, too soon" during merger negotiations. Fines of up to EUR 144,000 were imposed on five executives for their role in the infringement. These fines serve to remind companies that the exchange of commercially sensitive information – even during merger talks – may be forbidden by competition rules. During preliminary merger discussions, it is therefore advisable for companies to limit not only the extent and the impact of the information exchanged, but also the individuals involved in the merger discussions.

According to the press release by the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), the cold-storage companies were involved in merger talks between 2006 and 2009 and during these talks, exchanged competitively sensitive information with each other, shared customers and made price arrangements. One of the cold storage companies admitted to having been "too open, too soon" when holding merger talks. As a result, it implemented structural changes to its corporate culture and structure to prevent it from happening again.

The ACM used a procedure similar to the European Commission's cartel settlement regime to lower the fine imposed on this cold storage company by 10% in return for an acknowledgement of its involvement in and its liability for the infringement. The cold storage company's executives made use of the same procedure to have their personal fines reduced.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More