ARTICLE
14 August 2012

Tribunal Conditionally Approves Merger Between Synergy And Khuthala

WW
Webber Wentzel

Contributor

Webber Wentzel's team of experienced advisors provide multi-disciplinary legal and tax services to clients operating in and across the African continent. Whether expanding into Africa or growing operations across the continent or globally, Webber Wentzel offers exceptional client service and has an outstanding track record of working on some of the most sustainable and transformative matters in Africa.

On 20 July 2012 the Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) issued its reasons for the conditional approval of the intermediate merger between Synergy Income Fund Limited (Synergy) and Khuthala Alliance (Proprietary) Limited (Khuthala).
South Africa Antitrust/Competition Law

On 20 July 2012 the Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) issued its reasons for the conditional approval of the intermediate merger between Synergy Income Fund Limited (Synergy) and Khuthala Alliance (Proprietary) Limited (Khuthala). The conditions were issued to protect small businesses by requiring the removal of the exclusivity clause from the lease between Spar and Khuthala.

Spar is a 20% shareholder in Capital Land Asset Management (Proprietary) Limited, which is the fund manager of Synergy. The transaction was conditionally approved by the Tribunal on 8 March 2012.

Synergy is a variable loan stock company that owns certain retail property in various shopping centres that acquired the letting enterprise from Khuthala, known as the King Senzangakhona Shopping Centre.

The Competition Commission (Commission) found a horizontal overlap in respect of the provision of rentable retail space in South Africa. The Commission however found no geographical overlap and therefore concluded that the proposed transaction between the parties is unlikely to lessen or prevent competition in the market.

The Commission did, however, raise a public interest concern in relation to the exclusivity clause in the lease agreement between Spar and Khuthala. Although the inclusion of this clause is an industry-wide practice, the Commission assessed these clauses as creating a barrier to entry and excluding competition, with small independent retailers being most affected.

The conditions imposed by the Commission require Spar and the merging parties to negotiate to remove the exclusivity clause on renewal of the lease, and to provide a report to the Commission when the condition has been complied with.

Webber Wentzel represented the merging parties.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More