ARTICLE
4 November 2019

The Legal Standing Of Commissions Of Enquiry

SI
SchoemanLaw Inc.

Contributor

SchoemanLaw Inc. logo
SchoemanLaw Inc Attorneys, Conveyancers and Notaries Public, based in Cape Town, is a boutique law firm offering its clients access to high quality online legal documents and agreements, together with a wide range of legal services. The firm has an innovative and entrepreneurial mind-set that distinguishes it from other law firms. We apply our first-hand understanding of the challenges facing entrepreneurs (regardless of their business size) to develop proven, practical solutions incorporating legal compliance, risk aversion and business sense. We achieve this by offering clients tailored, yet holistic support comprising of legal gap analysis, the construction of tailored legal solutions and the practical implementation thereof through training and automation.
Today, one often hears the term, Commission or Commission of Inquiry, whether it be the "Zondo Commission" (on state capture) or numerous other references in the news.
South Africa Law Department Performance

Introduction

Today, one often hears the term, Commission or Commission of Inquiry, whether it be the "Zondo Commission" (on state capture) or numerous other references in the news. What is often less clear, however, is what the term "Commission" or Commission of Inquiry actually means and what the associated implications are. This article will briefly explore what these are.

As the name would imply, the purpose of a commission is to inquire and establish facts, and ultimately to render advice to those who established it. Furthermore, commissions operate within specific parameters, with specific terms of reference and powers.

How are commissions created

As a point of departure, the constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 is clear on who may appoint commissions. Section 84(1)(f) of the Constitution grants the President of the Republic the power to appoint commissions of Inquiry.

Nature of commissions of inquiry

Commissions of inquiry are distinct from court proceedings insofar as they inquisitorial in nature. In contrast to a South African court of law which is adversarial in nature, this means that the commission takes on an active and involved role in the proceedings rather than being an objective arbiter. Furthermore, the findings of commissions of Inquiry are not binding in the way that court rulings are, and they can only be subject to administrative review in term of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 ('PAJA") if and when they have a direct effect on a party.

Finally, commissions do have an advantage in the sense that they are able to admit any evidence that may be deemed useful to the inquiry, whereas a court of law may only consider admissible evidence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, commissions of inquiry can be useful for the purpose of purely establishing facts, as they are not bound by the same restrictions as the courts. Finally, because a commission's findings are non-binding there must be political will by those who establish them, such as the president, to enforce those findings.

Originally published October 7, 2019

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More