Litigation Law, Mediation Law and Arbitration Law

Road traffic accidents are among the most frequent reasons people seek legal counsel in Cyprus. While some cases settle directly with insurers, others demand thorough legal, medical, and factual examination—particularly when serious injuries, disputed liability, long-term symptoms, loss of earnings, or future medical needs are involved. This comprehensive FAQ addresses the most common questions about car accident and personal injury claims in Cyprus.

In Lynch v Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland [2026] IECA 95, the Court of Appeal noted a limitation in respect of section 26 of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 (2004 Act)...

The Irish High Court examines whether a hospital owes a duty of care to a patient's relative who develops PTSD after witnessing the immediate aftermath of a catastrophic medical error.

On the 7 July 2026, the First Hall Civil Court (the Court) presided over by Mr Justice Henri Mizzi delivered judgment in the names Joseph Caruana, Carmel Sciortino and Alexander Sciortino (the “Plaintiffs“) vs Kazin San Guzepp & Banda De Rohan A.D 1860 (the Respondent Club). T

The High Court has ruled on whether lenders must halt possession proceedings after re-engaging with borrowers under mortgage arrears protocols. This case examines the interplay between the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears and ongoing court proceedings, clarifying when post-commencement borrower communications affect a lender's ability to obtain possession orders.

The Dutch and American legal systems differ fundamentally in their approach to evidence gathering, with the United States employing an extensive pre-trial discovery process designed to ensure maximum transparency, while the Netherlands relies on a more limited system centered on parties' duty of truthfulness. This comparative analysis explores how these contrasting procedural frameworks shape litigation strategy, witness examination, and the overall conduct of civil proceedings in cross-border disputes.

On the 7 July 2026, the First Hall Civil Court (the Court) presided over by Mr Justice Henri Mizzi delivered judgment in the names Joseph Caruana, Carmel Sciortino and Alexander Sciortino (the “Plaintiffs“) vs Kazin San Guzepp & Banda De Rohan A.D 1860 (the Respondent Club). T

This page requires cookies to be enabled in your browser settings to function properly. The content provides instructions for users to check their browser configuration and enable cookies if they are currently disabled.

The High Court has ruled on whether lenders must halt possession proceedings after re-engaging with borrowers under mortgage arrears protocols. This case examines the interplay between the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears and ongoing court proceedings, clarifying when post-commencement borrower communications affect a lender's ability to obtain possession orders.

On the 7 July 2026, the First Hall Civil Court (the Court) presided over by Mr Justice Henri Mizzi delivered judgment in the names Joseph Caruana, Carmel Sciortino and Alexander Sciortino (the “Plaintiffs“) vs Kazin San Guzepp & Banda De Rohan A.D 1860 (the Respondent Club). T

The Irish High Court examines whether a hospital owes a duty of care to a patient's relative who develops PTSD after witnessing the immediate aftermath of a catastrophic medical error.

Has a family member died at work or while commuting to or from work? Discover who may be held responsible, what benefits INAIL provides, what additional compensation the family may be entitled to in 2026, and why it is crucial to act immediately with the assistance of a lawyer.