The African Continental Free Trade Area ("AfCFTA") presents a transformative opportunity for enhanced commercial integration among African States. However, its implementation also prompts scrutiny regarding financial crimes such as fraud, corruption, and money laundering. These concerns arise both from increased opportunity and volume of cross-border transactions and from the heightened complexity in regulatory oversight when trade barriers are reduced. The AfCFTA Agreement does not address financial crime risks. To safeguard the integrity of the AfCFTA framework, it is crucial that Member States, financial institutions, and all private sector participants adopt robust preventative and enforcement mechanisms to mitigate these risks.
A principal method for addressing these concerns is through the harmonisation of anti-corruption and anti-money laundering ("AML") standards across jurisdictions. Many African countries have domestic legislation targeting corruption and money laundering, which are often based on international instruments such as the Financial Action Task Force ("FATF") Recommendations and the United Nations Convention Against Corruption ("UNCAC"), and there are African Union ("AU") instruments such as the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption ("AUCPCC"). By integrating these established standards into the AfCFTA framework, signatory States can ensure that foundational principles of transparency, due diligence, and accountability are embodied throughout inter-jurisdictional transactions and contractual relationships.
Such harmonisation can be further bolstered through regional collaborations and peer review mechanisms aimed at evaluating compliance and fostering remedial action where necessary. It is, however, challenging to harmonise laws across African jurisdictions due to historical, legal, political, and socio-economic factors. African countries inherited different legal systems and, post-independence, continue to protect their autonomy as they collaborate with other countries. The process of harmonising laws requires strong institutions, technical expertise, and resources. While there are regional organisations, such as the African Union ("AU"), the Economic Community of West African States ("ECOWAS"), and the Southern African Development Community ("SADC"), that promote legal harmonisation, progress is often slow. Differences in Member States' commitment, legal traditions, and political will can adversely affect the adoption and implementation of harmonised laws.
Beyond legislative harmonisation, the efficacy of any anti-corruption or AML regime depends heavily on institutional capacity within AfCFTA Member States. Governments and regulatory authorities must be able to conduct comprehensive investigations with definitive outcomes, impose sanctions on violators, and provide a robust institutional structure for prosecutorial bodies, law enforcement agencies, and judiciary. In addition to this, it is important to have specialised training programmes that enhance the skill sets of investigators, prosecutors, and customs officials who will be assigned to address corruption and money laundering matters. This capacity-building is particularly significant in harmonised trade regimes, as the movement of goods and flow of funds can involve multi-jurisdictional parties and syndicates.
It is also crucial for AfCFTA Member States to focus on corporate compliance. Entities operating within or across AfCFTA borders must adopt effective internal policies designed to detect and prevent fraudulent or corrupt activities. In practice, this means robust "know your customer" ("KYC") and transaction analysis processes, thorough third-party due diligence, compliance audits, and the consistent training of employees on how to recognise and address potential non-compliance and illegal activity. Effective whistleblowing procedures, supported by legal protections for the individuals who report wrongdoing, can also serve as a powerful tool for the detection and deterrence of illegal activities.
Another key factor that serves to deter cross-border financial crimes is joint enforcement and information-sharing initiatives among African countries. Bilateral and multilateral agreements on mutual legal assistance and extradition are especially valuable, as they help ensure that individuals or entities engaging in illicit activity cannot opt to operate in jurisdictions with weaker investigative and law enforcement capabilities. Such cooperation can be enhanced by the adoption and use of shared digital platforms designed for real-time information exchange, enabling both governmental bodies and private organisations to identify suspicious or high-risk transactions at an early stage.
In summary, while the AfCFTA holds the promise of boosting economic growth and prosperity across the continent, it will require a focused and multi-jurisdictional effort by Member States to address the potential fraud, corruption, and money laundering risks. Success in this regard depends on harmonised legislation, strengthened institutions, corporate compliance, joint enforcement, and specialised training. By embedding these elements within its institutional framework, the AfCFTA can ensure that its foundational goals, namely, economic development, sustainable growth, and cross-border collaboration, are achieved without being undermined by illegal financial activity.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
