PRESS RELEASE
31 August 2026

K&L Gates Secures Second Circuit Victory In Significant False Claims Act Appeal

KG
K&L Gates LLP

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices worldwide, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, energy, and more.
K&L Gates LLP achieved a complete appellate victory when the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed dismissal of a False Claims Act whistleblower lawsuit that sought up to $2 billion in penalties against Ocean Harvesters. The relators had alleged the company
United States

Global law firm K&L Gates LLP secured a significant appellate victory for Ocean Harvesters and related defendants when the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed the dismissal of a False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower lawsuit challenging the companies’ eligibility to harvest menhaden in US waters. The appeal followed the firm's successful efforts to secure the dismissal of the action in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in January 2025.

The relators alleged that Ocean Harvesters was improperly controlled by a Canadian entity and therefore ineligible under the American Fisheries Act to participate in the US menhaden fishery. The relators claimed that the defendants had fraudulently obtained the right to harvest fish from US waters and that they could face exposure to up to $2 billion in penalties. The district court dismissed the case, concluding that the FCA did not apply because neither fishing licenses nor unharvested fish constitute government property. The Second Circuit affirmed, holding that wild fish in public waters are not government “property” within the meaning of the FCA and rejecting each of the relators’ theories of liability. The court also upheld the district court’s denial of leave to amend the complaint.

The K&L Gates team was led by Washington, DC partners Rob Silverblatt and Andrew Wright. The decision represents a complete victory for the client and a significant appellate ruling defining the limits of FCA liability, confirming that the statute cannot be expanded to encompass claims involving the harvesting of wild fish in public waters.

“We are grateful that the Second Circuit reiterated important limits on the False Claims Act statute and completely vindicated our client’s position that this case never belonged in court in the first place,” said Silverblatt.

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices worldwide, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, energy, and more.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More