Bankruptcy: Court clarifies its powers to approve payment proposals

WW
Wynn Williams Lawyers

Contributor

Wynn Williams is a renowned law firm in New Zealand, offering a full range of legal services with a team of skilled lawyers. Established in 1859, the firm is known for its expertise, straightforward advice, and strong client relationships. Recognized in prestigious legal directories, Wynn Williams is proud of its heritage and commitment to honest, experienced guidance for clients. Offices are located in Auckland, Christchurch, and Queenstown.
We discuss Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Wilson [2007] NZCA 100.
New Zealand Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

You are a creditor and have served a bankruptcy notice on a judgment debtor. The debtor puts forward a payment proposal which you reject. The debtor then applies to the Court seeking to set aside the bankruptcy notice and requests that the payment proposal be approved. Does the Court have jurisdiction to approve the payment proposal, despite the creditor's refusal?

The Court of Appeal in Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Wilson [2007] NZCA 100 recently considered this issue. The answer is a firm "no".

Background

Mr Wilson applied to the High Court to set aside a bankruptcy notice issued by the Commissioner and for the Court to approve his payment proposal. The proposal was declined by the Commissioner.

The High Court accepted the Court had inherent jurisdiction to entertain Mr Wilson's application. The Judge was impressed that Mr Wilson was offering payment in full and approved the payment proposal.

Court of Appeal judgment

The Court of Appeal reversed the earlier decision and helpfully clarified the law as follows:

  • A debtor can comply with a bankruptcy notice by making a payment proposal under subpart 2 of Part 5 of the Insolvency Act 2006. Those provisions provide a detailed regime requiring the Court's approval of a payment proposal, but only after it is accepted by a majority of creditors.
  • A debtor can compromise a debt with a creditor outside the subpart 2, Part 5 process. This does not require the Court's approval.
  • The Court does not have the power, statutory or inherent, to approve a payment proposal where it has been rejected by creditors. This would cut across the subpart 2, Part 5 process.
  • Parties cannot by consent or by concession, vest in the Court the jurisdiction to approve a payment proposal in Mr Wilson's situation.

This decision brings certainty to the bankruptcy process. A judgment creditor can rest assured that when it declines a payment proposal, that decision is final.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More