ARTICLE
3 July 2012

How To Prevent Frivolous Actions

O
OLIVARES

Contributor

Our mission is to provide innovative solutions and highly specialized legal advice for clients facing the most complicated legal and business challenges in Mexico. OLIVARES is continuously at the forefront of new practice areas concerning copyright, litigation, regulatory, anti-counterfeiting, plant varieties, domain names, digital rights, and internet-related matters, and the firm has been responsible for precedent-setting decisions in patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Our firm is committed to developing the strongest group of legal professionals to manage the level of complexity and interdisciplinary orientation that clients require. During the first decade of the 21st century, the team successfully led efforts to reshape IP laws and change regulatory authorizations procedures in Mexico, not only through thought leadership and lobbying efforts, but the firm has also won several landmark and precedent-setting cases at the Mexican Federal and Supreme Courts levels, including in constitutional matters.
Having spent years litigating IP matters, I have shared the frustration of clients who have been forced to intervene in administrative litigation because they are being frivolously accused of having committed an administrative infringement; their trademarks have been misappropriated; or their IP rights are being attacked in an ungrounded manner, through counterclaims that are filed in response to infringement actions previously filed by the owner of the IP right.
Mexico Intellectual Property

Managing Intellectual Property, June 2012

Having spent years litigating IP matters, I have shared the frustration of clients who have been forced to intervene in administrative litigation because they are being frivolously accused of having committed an administrative infringement; their trademarks have been misappropriated; or their IP rights are being attacked in an ungrounded manner, through counterclaims that are filed in response to infringement actions previously filed by the owner of the IP right.

The same situation occurs in copyright litigation, where you find opponents threatening absolutely ungrounded actions, and arguments contrary to the most basic principles of copyright and logic itself. It gets worse if you consider that any ruling coming from the Mexican Trademark Office or from the Mexican Copyright Office can be appealed through three or even more stages, which leads to scenarios of litigating one matter for seven or eight years. All this shows the urgent need for changes in Mexican Law in order to avoid the abuse of the judicial system, as well as to establish sanctions against attorneys who file notoriously ungrounded appeals, with the intention of merely extending litigious matters in an unjustified manner.

A good start would be mandatory admittance to a Bar for Mexican attorneys, which would improve the control over lawyers litigating IP matters. A second step would consist of establishing sanctions in the law for parties who file notoriously frivolous appeals, which should help to reduce the time litigating ungrounded matters. This sanction would consist mainly in the possibility for the affected party to get the attorney's fees, as already happens in civil cases. A final step would be establishing sanctions against attorneys who file notoriously frivolous actions. These sanctions could vary from a mere warning or reprimand, fines, and in case of recidivism, the loss of the attorney's licence. These simple measures would reduce the time for litigating IP matters, as well as reducing expenses for trade mark owners, which should lead to a more efficient protection and enforcement of IP rights in Mexico.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More