Global Trade Mark Protection: Exploring Single Filing Mechanisms And Their Impact

Abstract

How are Businesses identified? Ever wondered if for example there is a company, 'Google', giant in the Technological sector widely known for its most prominent search engine "Google"; and there is another Technology company working in Graphic Designing tools and services and wants to keep their name/ product name as 'Google' or may be 'Doogle', whether this shall be permitted or does it impact the initial company's (Google) reputation? These names used by the Companies which identify them are termed as 'Trade marks'. Trade marks are essential tools for business to establish their identities in markets. These Trade marks need to be registered to obtain certain statutory rights, which gives them exclusive rights to use their registered marks.

The registration process for trademarks can be complicated, especially when companies aim to protect their brand across multiple jurisdictions. This is where single filing mechanisms come into play; several Single Filing Mechanisms have been established to streamline the registration process, such as Madrid Protocol, the European Union Trademark (EUTM), and other regional systems like ARIPO and OAPI in Africa, and CARICOM in the Caribbean. This Blog explores the advantages and disadvantages of these mechanisms; I will also explain their brief history before diving into the proposed suggestions for improvement in the Global Trade mark registration framework.

Introduction

Trade mark Law is designed to protect distinctive signs/marks that are capable of identifying products or services, granting exclusive rights to applicants to use the mark in the registered jurisdiction, for example, the Indian Trade Marks Act, 1999 is the act that defines trade marks and is the law of the land for management, registration and usage of Trade marks in India. Trade mark rights are territorial, making it advisable to register in each country or region in which the applicant seeks protection. This traditional way also makes it an expensive task and cumbersome for businesses operation internationally to manage separate applications for each jurisdiction.

To ease this inconvenience and simplify the process, various single filing mechanisms have been introduced. Which enables applicants to submit a single application to obtain protection across many jurisdictions. These procedures minimise administrative burdens and overhead costs, enhance efficiency, and promote international trade by providing enterprises with a streamlined process for trade mark protection between jurisdictions. Nonetheless, issues persist, indicating areas for enhancement within these systems. This blog explores those in the latter stages.

Brief History

In the early 20th century, as international trade and commerce expanded rapidly, the demand for standardised trade mark registrations across many jurisdictions increased. The groundwork for these systems was established by international agreements like the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883), which promoted collaboration among members to uphold trademarks and other intellectual property rights.

However, the significant transformation occurred with the inception of the Madrid Agreement in 1891, followed by the Madrid Protocol in 1989. These accords allow trademark proprietors to seek protection in numerous member nations by submitting a single application via their domestic trade mark office.

Subsequently, numerous regional systems emerged. The European Union Trade Mark (EUTM), established in 1996, enables the submission of trade marks through a unified filing system that offers protection throughout all EU member states. In Africa, the African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation (ARIPO) and the Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OAPI) provide unified filing systems for their member states. Likewise, other regional organisations such as CARICOM, EAEU, GCC, and the Pacific Alliance have implemented procedures to facilitate trademark registrations inside their respective regions.

Single Filing Mechanisms in use

As of now, there are multiple single filing mechanisms existing across nations, a brief listing of which is provided below:

1. Madrid Protocol: Administrated by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), this system allows trademark holders to seek protection in over 130 member countries through a single filing application. The Applicants first file a national or regional trademark and can then extend their protection internationally.
2. European Union Trademark (EUTM): Trademark holders can gain protection across all 27 EU member states by filing a single application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
3. Benelux Trademark: The Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) provides a single filing mechanism for Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg.
4. African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation (ARIPO): ARIPO covers a group of English-speaking African countries that have adopted the Banjul Protocol.
5. Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OAPI): OAPI covers a group of French-speaking African member states, providing them with the facility of a single filing mechanism for these states.
6. Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU): The EAEU includes Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan; although there is no mechanism introduced for this yet, this is one of the upcoming mechanisms for which the plans are in place.

In addition to the above, there are more that are under development process, like CARICOM, GCC and Pacific Alliance. A single filing mechanism for them is expected soon.

Advantages of Single Filing Mechanisms

Some of the major advantages of Single filing Mechanisms are listed below:

1. Cost Efficiency: The first and foremost significant advantage that this mechanism provides is the cost saving aspect, as this reduces the cost of applying separately in multiple jurisdictions and rather filing a single application, reducing administrative fees and legal costs.
2. Procedure Simplification: Single filing mechanisms simplify the often complex trademark registration process by offering a centralised filing route, this eliminates the need for companies to navigate different legal systems and languages specifically needed jurisdictionally if going for individual filing applications.
3. Unified Management: When Trade marks are registered through a single filing system, subsequent renewals, assignments, or oppositions can be managed in one place, which provides a streamlined approach to manage trade marks.
4. Faster Process: When filing is done through a single filing system, it is typically faster than applying for trademarks in each jurisdiction individually. This allows businesses to secure protection much quicker, which is very important in highly competitive industries like pharmaceuticals.
5. Broader Protection: Specifically for businesses operating internationally, single filing mechanisms provide a broader scope of protection across multiple jurisdictions, ensuring consistency and reducing the risk of infringement.

Disadvantages of Single Filing Mechanisms:

1. Centralised Risk: A major drawback of single filing mechanisms is that if an application faces opposition or refusal in one jurisdiction, it can affect the entire filing, for example, in case of EUTM, if the application is rejected in one EU member state, protection is denied in all member states.
2. Lack of Uniform Interpretation/ Laws on Intellectual Property: Although Single filing systems simplify the filing process, the interpretation of trademark laws can still vary between jurisdictions. This can lead to inconsistencies in how a trademark is treated across different jurisdictions.
3. Limited Coverage: a Single filing System does not cover all jurisdictions/countries; for example, the Madrid Protocol doesn't include some key markets, such as some Latin American and Caribbean Jurisdictions, and large economies like Brazil (Until recently in 2019), This forces businesses to seek protection outside the system in non-member states.
4. Refusal Costs: While the initial filing may be more cost – effective, refusal of an application in any jurisdiction may necessitate separate national filings, increasing costs and complexity.

Proposals for Improving Single Filing Mechanisms:

1. Wider Participation: Single filing Mechanisms can be much more effective, if more countries can join the existing frameworks, for example, the Madrid Protocol if could expanded and if we could bring in more countries to regional systems like CARICOM and Pacific Alliance, it would provide much broader coverage.
2. Universalisation/ Harmonization of Trademark Laws: One of the issues is that interpretation and enforcement of the trade mark laws is diverged across jurisdictions. International efforts can be made to harmonize these laws to reduce the likelihood of conflicting decisions and ensure greater consistency across borders.
3. Flexibility in Enforcement: Centralized systems like the EUTM should allow for partial acceptance in cases where a mark is refused in one jurisdiction but accepted in other jurisdiction, this would mitigate the risk of losing protection across an entire region due to an issue in single jurisdiction.
4. Awareness: Many Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are unaware of the benefits of Single Filing systems. An awareness or information system with some support facilities could be provided by National Trademark offices and International Organisations for businesses to take advantage of these mechanisms.

Conclusion:

Single filing methods signify a substantial progress in international trade mark protection, providing businesses with a more efficient and economical method to obtain and manage trade marks in several jurisdictions. Although these systems offer distinct benefits, like cost efficiency and streamlined processes, they also present difficulties, such as centralised risks and restricted coverage. Enhancing participation, standardising trademark legislation, and implementing more adaptable enforcement strategies can strengthen these institutions to more effectively support businesses in the contemporary global economy.

References

1 WIPO. "Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks." World Intellectual Property Organization. (https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html )

2 EUIPO. "European Union Trade Mark (EUTM)." European Union Intellectual Property Office. (https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en )

3 ARIPO. "The Banjul Protocol on Marks." African Regional Intellectual Property Organization. (https://www.aripo.org/ )

4 OAPI. "Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle." (http://www.oapi.int/index.php/fr/ )

5 GCC Intellectual Property Office. "Gulf Cooperation Council Trademark System." (https://abounaja.com/blog/patent-registration-in-the-gcc )

To view the original article click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.