SEBI's Crackdown On Finfluencers: Regulations And Enforcement

Introduction

India's Securities and Exchange Board has barred finfluencer Avadhut Sathe and his entities from the securities market and ordered the impounding of over Rs 546 crore, calling it one of the toughest actions yet in this space. Retail-focused guidelines issued in early 2025 now restrict collaborations between SEBI-regulated intermediaries and unregistered financial influencers, closing a major loophole in the digital advice ecosystem.

SEBI's Crackdown in Brief

The December 4, 2025 order against Avadhut Sathe, founder of the Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy (ASTA), marks a turning point in SEBI's push to clean up the finfluencer ecosystem. SEBI concluded that Sathe's operations were effectively providing unregistered investment advisory and research services under the cover of education while collecting hundreds of crores from participants.

The regulator found that the model relied on market-linked promises, selective profit showcasing, and use of market data in a way that could mislead retail investors. SEBI's investigation began after complaints that the academy was not just offering trading courses but also giving out buy and sell calls during live market sessions. SEBI analyzed videos, WhatsApp messages, social media content, payment structures and testimonies of participants to build its case.

In one example highlighted by SEBI, Sathe was shown conducting a live trading session where he instructed participants to enter a Bank Nifty futures trade at a particular price, along with the stop-loss and target. SEBI noted that this went far beyond education and became a direct investment recommendation. The order stated that the activities of the noticees were not limited to general training. They were providing specific advice with entry and exit points. Such conduct is characteristic of an investment adviser, not an educator.

SEBI added that the academy's counselling batches were a structured system through which Sathe and his team guided participants on real trades, often using private WhatsApp groups to give instant instructions. Some of these groups had hundreds of members paying high fees.

Key Regulatory Changes

SEBI's updated framework prohibits brokers, mutual funds, and other regulated entities from using unregistered finfluencers for marketing, advertising, or performance claims such as assured or guaranteed returns. The rules also bar the use of live stock prices by finfluencers, allowing only historical data with at least a three-month lag and drawing a sharper line between neutral education and actionable investment advice.

1. Registered brokers, mutual funds, and other intermediaries are barred from associating with unregistered finfluencers for marketing, referral, or promotional arrangements that involve direct or indirect compensation.
2. Finfluencers can discuss markets in a broad, educational way but cannot give specific buy/sell/hold calls, coded references to particular securities, or real-time trading cues without appropriate SEBI registration.
3. Any use of stock or index data in educational content must generally be based on prices that are at least three months old, and promotional claims about performance or guaranteed returns are off-limits for unregistered individuals.
4. Investor education content is allowed if it avoids direct or indirect stock tips, coded messaging around specific securities, or inducements to trade.
5. Platforms and intermediaries are expected to remove violative content and terminate non-compliant tie-ups, with enforcement ranging from monetary penalties to suspension or cancellation of registrations in serious cases.

High-Profile Enforcement Actions

SEBI found that ASTA frequently advertised high-probability strategies that could change a trader's life and used screenshots of profitable trades to promote the courses. The regulator said this created a false sense of guaranteed returns, which is against investor-protection rules.

The order criticized the selective showcasing of profits while hiding losses. SEBI wrote that the noticees repeatedly displayed only favourable outcomes to prospective clients. This conduct is misleading and intended to induce them to subscribe to the programmes.

SEBI also noted that Sathe continued these practices even after receiving a formal warning earlier in 2024, and instead made the activities more private to avoid scrutiny. The training programmes offered by ASTA ranged from basic to advanced levels, with some costing as much as Rs 6.75 lakh per person. SEBI said the fees were not just for theoretical lessons but for access to real-time actionable advice, which made the entire model functionally indistinguishable from paid investment advisory.

The order stated that the academy was deriving wrongful gains by offering advisory services under the guise of education, which led SEBI to calculate the impounded amount of Rs 546 crore.

Current Enforcement Orders

SEBI has barred Avadhut Sathe, ASTA and director Gouri Sathe from the securities market until further orders. They cannot buy or sell securities, cannot run any advisory activity and cannot conduct live trading sessions that involve stock suggestions.

1. Banks have been instructed to freeze their accounts until Rs 546 crore is placed in fixed deposits under lien to SEBI.
2. The noticees shall not solicit or undertake any activity related to investment advisory, research or portfolio management in any form, including training modules that involve real-time calls.
3. The noticees must share complete financial records, asset details, bank statements, GST filings and a list of every customer who paid for their programmes.
4. This is the largest sum ever impounded from a finfluencer in India, signaling a tough line from SEBI.

Impacts on Investors, Markets, and Influencers

For retail investors, the new rules are designed to reduce exposure to aggressive get-rich-quick narratives and real-time trading tips masquerading as education, thereby lowering the risk of herd behaviour and mis-sold strategies. SEBI and policy commentators expect that the shift toward lagged data and registered advisory channels will gradually prioritize transparent, research-backed financial education over personality-driven speculation.

1. Retail traders benefit from reduced exposure to misleading profit guarantees and get-rich-quick schemes that operate outside regulatory oversight.
2. Market integrity benefits from cutting off monetary incentives between regulated intermediaries and unregistered promoters, which in turn aims to reduce manipulation, misleading endorsements, and conflicts of interest in the digital finance ecosystem.
3. Trust in securities markets is expected to strengthen as finfluencer activities shift away from personality-driven speculation toward verified, transparent education.

For influencers and platforms, business models built on live market commentary, affiliate trading calls, and performance marketing face clear headwinds, with many expected to pivot to regulated roles or purely educational formats. The case sets a clear benchmark for what SEBI considers illegal. If a trainer or influencer provides stock-specific instructions, shows live trades, or uses private groups to guide market positions, they may be treated as an unregistered adviser.

Conclusion

SEBI's comprehensive crackdown on unregistered finfluencers represents a fundamental shift in how India regulates financial content in the digital age. The December 2025 action against Avadhut Sathe, with the impounding of Rs 546 crore, demonstrates that SEBI will treat finfluencer activities providing specific investment advice as unregistered advisory services regardless of how they are branded or structured.

The regulatory framework established through the January 2025 circular and reinforced by high-profile enforcement actions creates clear boundaries between permissible investor education and prohibited investment advice. These boundaries are marked by the use of real-time data, the provision of specific trading instructions, reliance on performance guarantees, and the existence of structured systems that guide retail investors through individual trades.

For the broader market ecosystem, these measures address a genuine gap that emerged as social media became a primary source of financial information for millions of retail investors in India. The association restrictions imposed on regulated intermediaries ensure that established financial entities cannot circumvent SEBI's regulatory oversight by outsourcing advisory functions to unregistered individuals, thereby preserving the integrity of the registration and oversight framework.

The impact extends across three key stakeholder groups. Retail investors benefit from reduced exposure to unverified market claims and personality-driven trading advice that frequently resulted in significant financial losses. Regulated financial services companies are incentivized to invest in compliant, transparent education and advisory services rather than seeking workarounds through influencer partnerships. Finfluencers face a clear choice between obtaining proper registration, pivoting to purely educational content using lagged data, or exiting the market altogether.

Going forward, the enforcement approach signals that SEBI will conduct detailed content analysis and participant testimony investigations to determine whether finfluencer activities constitute illegal advisory services. This approach puts ongoing responsibility on platforms, intermediaries, and the finfluencer community itself to ensure compliance with the regulatory standards established in the circular and reinforced through orders like the Avadhut Sathe case. The trajectory suggests that finfluencer-related enforcement will remain a priority for SEBI, with potential for broader action across multiple platforms and influencers in the coming months.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a finfluencer under SEBI's lens?

A finfluencer is an individual or entity that creates finance-related content for the public on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, or Telegram, often covering stocks, trading, mutual funds, or personal finance. SEBI's recent actions focus on those who, without registration, cross the line from generic education into investment advice, stock tips, or trading calls that can influence real-money decisions.

Why did SEBI ban Avadhut Sathe?

SEBI banned Avadhut Sathe after concluding that his trading academy was effectively providing unregistered investment advisory and research services under the cover of education and collecting hundreds of crores from participants. The regulator found that the model relied on market-linked promises, selective profit showcasing, and use of market data in a way that could mislead retail investors, prompting a ban and an order to impound unlawful gains.

Can finfluencers still talk about stocks and markets?

Finfluencers can discuss markets in a broad, educational way but cannot give specific buy/sell/hold calls, coded references to particular securities, or real-time trading cues without appropriate SEBI registration. Any use of stock or index data in educational content must generally be based on prices that are at least three months old, and promotional claims about performance or guaranteed returns are off-limits for unregistered individuals.

Are SEBI-registered brokers allowed to work with finfluencers?

SEBI-registered brokers, mutual funds, and other intermediaries are barred from associating with unregistered finfluencers for marketing, referral, or promotional arrangements that involve direct or indirect compensation. They may support genuine investor education initiatives, but only where content stays on the right side of SEBI's code of conduct and avoids investment advice or unapproved performance representations.

How do these rules protect retail investors?

The rules target misleading get-rich-quick narratives, remove financial incentives for unregulated online advice, and narrow the space for manipulative market commentary aimed at inexperienced traders. By directing investors toward registered advisors and transparent disclosures while restraining aggressive performance marketing, SEBI aims to reduce losses from hype-driven decisions and strengthen long-term trust in securities markets.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.