- within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- in United States
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Technology and Law Firm industries
- Introduction: When Content Power Meets Platform Power
When a single platform begins to exercise influence over both the creation and distribution of content, questions of law inevitably follow. The proposed merger between Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery has therefore attracted global attention not merely because of its commercial scale, but because it represents a defining moment in how competition law, media regulation, and digital market governance will treat consolidation in creative industries.
At its core, the Netflix–Warner Bros merger is not simply about combining balance sheets or expanding subscriber bases. It is about the consolidation of extensive content libraries, creative production capacity, and global distribution pipelines under a single corporate umbrella. Such concentration raises serious competition law concerns in digital streaming markets, where power is increasingly exercised through intellectual property ownership, exclusivity, data control, and algorithmic visibility rather than pricing alone.
While the proposed transaction has sparked debate in the United States over efficiencies, synergies, and expanded consumer choice, it has also triggered regulatory scrutiny around content exclusivity, foreclosure of competitors, and long-term consumer welfare. These concerns are not confined to the US or Europe. For countries like India, where OTT platforms have become an essential part of daily cultural consumption, global mergers of this nature carry deep domestic implications.
India today stands as one of Netflix's fastest-growing markets. Decisions taken at the global level directly shape content availability, competitive dynamics, and consumer choice within India's rapidly expanding digital entertainment ecosystem. The legal and regulatory impact of the Netflix–Warner Bros merger must therefore be examined not as a distant foreign development, but as a matter of immediate relevance to Indian competition law, media policy, and cultural autonomy.
- India's OTT Landscape and Dependence on Global Content
The Indian OTT market is distinctive because of its diversity. Indian audiences move seamlessly between regional language content, Bollywood cinema, Korean dramas, and Hollywood franchises. Over the years, Warner Bros and HBO titles have developed a loyal and consistent audience base in India. Changes in their licensing arrangements have repeatedly shown how deeply international content libraries influence Indian subscriber behaviour.
The withdrawal of HBO content from Disney+ Hotstar, for instance, led to a noticeable shift in subscriber sentiment and engagement patterns. This episode underlined a crucial reality of India's digital entertainment market: access to premium international content significantly determines competition, platform stickiness, and consumer choice.
If Netflix were to acquire exclusive rights over Warner Bros and HBO content in India, the structure of the OTT market would change materially. Netflix would not only expand the diversity of content available on its platform but also significantly alter bargaining dynamics across the industry. Competing platforms that rely on licensed international films and television series would find it increasingly difficult to compete against an entity controlling one of the world's most valuable content libraries.
Smaller and niche OTT platforms, many of which position themselves through curated international cinema or limited premium catalogues, would face disproportionate competitive pressure. A unified catalogue comprising franchises such as Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, and major DC titles would allow Netflix to strengthen viewer loyalty, influence pricing expectations, and redefine what Indian consumers perceive as “premium” content.
Over time, such dominance may translate into greater control over advertising rates, content valuation, and even negotiations with Indian production houses. The legal concern here is not merely about market share but about the cumulative effect of content concentration on competition and consumer welfare in India's OTT ecosystem.
- Consolidation, Vertical Integration and Creative Markets
A major source of concern surrounding the Netflix–Warner Bros merger lies in vertical integration. When a platform controls both content production and distribution, it reshapes the creative economy in subtle but profound ways. Vertical integration allows a platform to influence what content is commissioned, how it is promoted, and where it is released, often without overt coercion.
In creative markets, producers tend to pitch projects that align with the tastes and commercial preferences of dominant buyers. Genres perceived as predictable and globally scalable are more likely to receive funding, while experimental, regional, or culturally specific narratives struggle to secure budgets. Independent studios and emerging creators often find themselves operating within tight financial constraints and limited distribution access, restricting their ability to reach national or global audiences.
This is not a hypothetical concern. In markets such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and South Korea, vertically integrated broadcasters and platforms have demonstrably shaped national creative output by prioritising formats that fit platform-driven consumption models. India's creative industry, characterised by linguistic, cultural, and regional diversity, relies heavily on OTT platforms to transcend geographical boundaries.
If Netflix were to dominate both production and distribution in India on a larger scale following the merger, Indian creators may gradually feel compelled to conform to global storytelling templates. Over time, this could marginalise locally rooted narratives that reflect regional cultures, social realities, and audience sensibilities, raising long-term cultural policy concerns alongside competition law issues.
- Content Exclusivity and Consumer Welfare in India
Content exclusivity has become a defining feature of OTT competition. Platforms aggressively acquire exclusive rights to drive subscriber acquisition and retention. While exclusivity can incentivise original content creation, excessive concentration of exclusive content can distort markets and fragment audiences.
If Warner Bros and HBO titles are added to Netflix's already extensive exclusive portfolio, Indian subscription patterns are likely to shift significantly. While this may initially benefit Netflix, the broader impact may be increased fragmentation of viewership and rising subscription costs across the market.
Experience from other jurisdictions indicates that vertically integrated streaming platforms often introduce higher subscription tiers, reduce interoperability between services, and narrow the range of content accessible to consumers without multiple subscriptions. Indian consumers, who are highly price-sensitive, may face a difficult choice between subscribing to several platforms or losing access to previously available content.
From a legal perspective, this raises questions about consumer welfare beyond short-term price effects. Indian competition law has traditionally focused on pricing and output. However, in digital content markets, non-price factors such as choice, diversity, accessibility, and quality play an equally significant role in assessing market harm.
- The Regulatory Challenge for India
Digital market developments have posed complex challenges for Indian competition authorities. The Competition Commission of India has, over the years, acknowledged the limitations of traditional competition analysis in digital markets through cases involving e-commerce, online food delivery, and telecommunications.
In these sectors, the CCI has recognised that market power is no longer derived solely from pricing or market share. Instead, it flows from control over data, network effects, algorithmic reach, exclusive access to key inputs, and the ability to shape user behaviour. OTT platforms exemplify this shift, as their influence is deeply tied to intellectual property ownership and content exclusivity.
Even though the Netflix–Warner Bros merger is a foreign transaction, it carries obvious implications for India. Global platforms tend to operate with similar strategies across jurisdictions. Indian law allows the CCI to examine combinations that have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. However, determining what constitutes “material impact” in digital entertainment markets remains complex.
Should exclusive international content be treated as a source of market power equivalent to essential facilities? Should vertical integration rules be recalibrated for creative industries? Should Indian regulators adopt forward-looking tools to assess how global mergers influence user behaviour, creator incentives, and long-term market structure in India?
These questions are not merely technical. They shape how India protects competition in fast-evolving markets where harm often becomes visible only after structural changes have occurred.
- Cross-Border Mergers and Gaps in Indian Merger Control
A practical challenge under Indian competition law lies in merger notification thresholds. Currently, foreign mergers are not mandatorily notifiable unless the parties meet specified asset or turnover thresholds linked to India. A global entertainment merger may therefore escape scrutiny even when its competitive impact in India is substantial.
Digital and content-driven markets expose the limitations of purely financial thresholds. A platform may exert enormous influence over Indian consumers without significant local assets or revenues at the time of merger. India's evolving competition regime, particularly following the Competition (Amendment) Act, reflects an awareness of this gap by enabling impact-based assessments.
However, for these reforms to be effective, they must be supported by sector-specific guidance addressing digital and creative markets. Without clear frameworks for assessing content concentration, data control, and algorithmic influence, regulatory intervention risks arriving too late.
- Implications for India's Cultural and Creative Future
Beyond competition law, the Netflix–Warner Bros merger raises deeper questions about cultural sovereignty and creative independence. India has consciously positioned itself as a global content hub. Regional storytelling has flourished, new genres have emerged, and sectors such as animation, gaming, and VFX have expanded rapidly.
A global reallocation of streaming power could disrupt this momentum. If Netflix gains greater control over distribution pipelines, it may effectively decide which Indian stories achieve global visibility and which remain confined to domestic audiences. Market power, in such contexts, gradually transforms into cultural power.
A platform controlling both content creation and distribution can shape global narratives by deciding which stories are amplified. As India continues to define its place in the global content economy, control over digital screens becomes as significant as control over traditional cultural institutions.
- What India Needs Going Forward
India's approach to digital mergers and acquisitions must evolve in response to these realities. This requires moving beyond static market definitions and recognising the competitive significance of content libraries, licensing arrangements, and algorithmic visibility.
The Competition (Amendment) Act has taken steps towards impact-based merger assessment. However, these changes must be complemented by detailed regulatory guidance tailored to digital and creative industries. Regulators need tools capable of evaluating long-term effects on competition, innovation, and cultural diversity, rather than relying solely on short-term efficiency gains.
Strengthening regulatory oversight does not mean opposing every large merger. It means ensuring that India possesses the institutional capacity to safeguard competition, protect consumers, and promote creative diversity in an increasingly consolidated global market.
- Conclusion: Preparing for the Future of Streaming Regulation
The Netflix–Warner Bros deal may take time to conclude, or it may never materialise. Its importance for India lies less in its final outcome and more in the questions it raises. India is no longer a passive recipient of global digital trends. It is an active, high-value market whose regulatory choices will shape its digital future.
Understanding the legal and regulatory impact of global OTT mergers today allows India to design frameworks capable of responding to future disruptions. The objective is not to resist change, but to ensure that creators, consumers, and markets benefit equitably from the digital revolution through a functional, efficient, and forward-looking regulatory regime.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
