Founded by Managing Partner K.P. Sreejith, INDIALAW began as a small firm in Mumbai with a commitment to client service and corporate-focused legal solutions. From its modest beginnings, the firm has grown into a respected name by prioritizing excellence, integrity, and tailored legal strategies. INDIALAW’s team believes in adapting to each client’s unique needs, ensuring that solutions align with individual circumstances and business goals.
The firm combines its deep understanding of the local business landscape with experience across multiple jurisdictions, enabling clients to navigate complex legal environments effectively. INDIALAW emphasizes proactive service, anticipating client needs and potential challenges to provide timely, high-quality legal support. The firm values lasting client relationships and sees its role as a trusted advisor, dedicated to delivering business-friendly and principled legal counsel.
In this episode of the Legal Podcast Bite powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Ishika Soni discusses a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India, clarifying the limits of post-retirement disciplinary proceedings...
In this episode of the Legal Podcast Bite powered by IndiaLaw
LLP, host Ishika Soni discusses a landmark judgment of the Supreme
Court of India, clarifying the limits of post-retirement
disciplinary proceedings in service law. The case involving, Kadir
Khan Ahmed Khan Pathan and the Maharashtra State Warehousing
Corporation raised a crucial question: can an employer initiate
disciplinary proceedings and recover alleged losses after an
employee has already retired when the service regulations do not
expressly allow it?
The Court examined the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension)
Rules, 1982, the Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation (Staff)
Service Regulations, 1992, and constitutional protections under
Constitution of India. Reaffirming earlier precedents such as
Bhagirathi Jena v. Board of Directors, OSFC, the Court held that
without explicit statutory authority and mandatory government
sanction, post-retirement disciplinary proceedings are without
jurisdiction.The ruling reinforces that retiral benefits like
gratuity and provident fund are protected property rights and
cannot be withheld arbitrarily.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
