ARTICLE
18 February 2025

LD Munich, February 12, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_714/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
A case is not "pending before a division of the Court of First Instance" pursuant to Art. 33(2) UPCA, if it is pending in the appeal instance. It is pending before the Court of Appeal if the appeal was filed there.
Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

LD Munich competent to hear an infringement action, although appeal before the Court of Appeal is pending between the same parties regarding an action for provisional measures based on the same patent that was filed in first instance with the LD Düsseldorf

A case is not "pending before a division of the Court of First Instance" pursuant to Art. 33(2) UPCA, if it is pending in the appeal instance. It is pending before the Court of Appeal if the appeal was filed there.

2. Division

LD Munich

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_714/2024, App_67626/2024, ORD_68717/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Preliminary objection

5. Parties

Claimant: biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG

Defendants: 1. Light Guide Optics Germany GmbH, 2. S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE International

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 685 783

7. Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

8. Body of legislation / Rules

Art. 33(2) UPCA

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More