ARTICLE
8 April 2026

Procedures On The Excise Refunds – Minister Of Finance Regulation No. 113 Of 2025 On Excise Refunds

NL
Nusantara Legal Partnership

Contributor

NLP is a boutique law firm located in Jakarta, Indonesia. Our firm concentrating on; (a) General Corporate, (b) Employment, (c) Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), (d) Commercial Litigation, (e) Pharmaceutical, (f) Merger and Acquisition, (g) Insurance, and (h) Information Technology. Our firm is composed of highly skilled lawyers with exceptional analytic skills and proven experiences in the legal sphere with the ability to cater clients’ needs of comprehensive legal solution. We possess the required experiences and rich knowledge in our respective practice areas. We are committed to advocate our clients' cause earnestly and supporting their outcomes.
On 30 December 2025, the Minister of Finance issued MoF Regulation No. 113 of 2025 on Excise Refunds. This regulation revokes MoF Regulation No. 113/PMK.04/2008 of 2008 on Excise Refunds and/or Administrative Sanction in the Form of Fines.
Indonesia Finance and Banking
Audria Putri’s articles from Nusantara Legal Partnership are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking topic(s)
Nusantara Legal Partnership are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking, Real Estate and Construction and International Law topic(s)

On 30 December 2025, the Minister of Finance (“MoF”) issued MoF Regulation No. 113 of 2025 on Excise Refunds (“MoF Reg. 113/2025”). This regulation revokes MoF Regulation No. 113/PMK.04/2008 of 2008 on Excise Refunds and/or Administrative Sanction in the Form of Fines (“MoF Reg. 113/2008”). While the objectives and contents of MoF Reg. 113/2025 are broadly similar to those of MoF Reg. 113/2008, MoF Reg. 113/2025 provides further clarification on the procedures for excise refunds.  

In this article, we highlight key provisions that business owners should consider in relation to claiming an excise refund to the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (“DGoCE”) under MoF Reg. 113/2025.

1. Conditions for Excise Refunds: The qualification for excise refunds remains largely unchanged from those under MoF Reg. 113/2008. In particular, the conditions of the goods to be eligible for excise refunds are generally consistent with the ones under the previous framework. Under Article 2(2) of MoF Reg. 113/2025, goods are eligible for excise refund if they fall into any of the following conditions:

  1. the goods’ excise has been paid by way of affixing excise stamps, provided that the stamps are ordered in the current fiscal year and/or in the immediately preceding fiscal year; or
  2. the goods’ excise has been paid by way of payment settlement, provided that the excise is paid in the current fiscal year and/or in the immediately preceding fiscal year.  

2. Entitled Parties: MoF Reg. 113/2025 stipulates different types of excise refunds and identifies the parties entitled to apply for them. In particular, the regulation refers to the following entities: (i) manufacturers; (ii) importers of excisable goods; (iii) storage business operators; or (iv) other parties as determined by a Tax Court decision (collectively referred to as “Entitled Party”).

Further, the regulation identifies the Entitled Party as those eligible to apply for excise refunds, subject to the satisfaction of the refund conditions. The table below summarises the foregoing:

Qualification

Entitled Party

Remarks

Overpayment resulting from a miscalculation.

(Article 3 of MoF Reg.113/2025)

  • Manufacturers.
  • Storage business operators.
  • Importers of excisable goods.
  • This refund is available where excise is paid by affixing excise stamps or payment settlement.
  • An overpayment may arise from:
    1. a basic arithmetic error;
    2. an incorrect application of the tariff and/or price; or
    3. an error in counting.
    The error may be identified by the relevant Entitled Party or a customs and excise officer.
  • A Notice of Excise Overpayment Assessment (Surat Penetapan Kelebihan Pembayaran Cukai or “SPKCP”) forms the basis for the refund. The SPKCP is issued upon assessment of the overpayment by the relevant DGoCE office.

Exported excisable goods.

(Articles 4 – 5 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

Manufacturers.

Where the excise is paid by affixing excise stamps

  • The manufacturer must submit a notification on the settled excisable export goods to the relevant DGoCE office.  
  • Proof of the excise stamp destruction and proof of payment for excise stamps replacement form the basis for the refund.
  • Manufacturers.
  • Storage business operators.

Where the excise is paid by payment settlement

  • The manufacturer or storage business operator must submit a notification on the settled excisable export goods to the relevant DGoCE office.  
  • The minutes and the notification constitute the documentary basis for the refund.

Excisable goods manufactured in Indonesia that are reprocessed at a factory.

 (Articles 6 - 11 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

Manufacturers.

  • This refund is available where excise was paid either by affixing excise stamp or payment settlement.

Destroyed excisable goods manufactured in Indonesia.

(Articles 6 - 11 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

  • Manufacturers.
  • Storage business operators.
  • Importers of excisable goods.
  • To qualify, regardless of the reprocessing or destruction carried out inside or outside the factory, the manufacturer must:
    1. facilitate the inspection of the excisable goods to be reprocessed or destroyed; and
    2. submit a notification to the relevant DGoCE office.
  • The minutes, proof of destruction of the excise stamps, and proof of payment of the replacement fee for the excise stamps form the basis for the refund.

Destroyed excisable goods that are not ultimately imported and are still located within the customs area.

(Article 12 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

Importers of excisable goods.

  • This refund is available where excise is paid by payment settlement.
  • To qualify, the importer must:
    1. facilitate the inspection of the excisable goods that are not ultimately imported; and
    2. submit a notification to the relevant DGoCE office regarding the destruction of such goods.
  • If the DGoCE customs area and the importers place of business supervising DGoCE differs, the notification shall be carbon copied to the DGoCE supervising the importer’s place of business.
  • Proof of the excise stamp destruction and proof of payment for the excise stamp replacement form the basis for the refund.

Exempted excisable goods under the excise laws.

(Article 13 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

  • Manufacturers.
  • Storage business operators.
  • Importers of excisable goods.
  • Granted after fulfilment of the condition of payment settlement.
  • Decision on the excisable goods exemption, release document, and proof of the excise payment settlement shall be the basis to obtain the excise refund.

Excise stamps returned because they are damaged or unused.

(Article 14 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

  • Manufacturers.
  • Importers of excisable goods.
  • This refund applies to excisable goods, which excise is payable by affixing excise stamps or payment settlement.
  • For the excise paid by affixing excise stamps, the stamps must satisfy the following conditions:
    1. they have been received and have not been attached by the manufacturer or importer of excisable goods; and
    2. they remain in the form of intact sheets, as those delivered from the excise stamps printer,
    followed by the submission of a notification regarding the unused excise stamps or excise stamps destruction to the relevant DGoCE office.
  • Proof of the excise stamp destruction and proof of payment for excise stamps replacement form the basis for the refund.

Overpayment resulting from a Tax Court decision.

(Article 15 of MoF Reg. 113/2025)

Any Entitled Party.

The Tax Court decision document shall be the basis for the excise refund.

3. Refund Mechanism: MoF Reg. 113/2025 further clarifies the refund mechanism, not expressly addressed in the earlier regulation. Under Article 16 of MoF Reg. 113/2025, an excise refund is granted to the Entitled Party based on the relevant refund document, provided that: (i) the excise payment for the refund is recorded in the state treasury; and (ii) the refund request is made within 10 years from the date of issuance of the relevant underlying refund document.

The refund is granted after being set off against the Entitled Party’s outstanding excise liabilities. If the Entitled Party has no outstanding excise liabilities, it may use the refund for either: (i) settlement of future excise liabilities; and/or (ii) cash refund.

Where the Entitled Party intends to use the refund to settle future excise liabilities, it must notify the head of the relevant DGoCE office of that intended use. By contrast, a refund arising from a Tax Court decision may only be made in cash.  

MoF Reg. 113/2025 also formalizes the electronic refund mechanism, reflecting existing practice. Refund applications may now be submitted online through the dedicated system established by DGoCE, CEISA 4.0.(https://portal.beacukai.go.id/).

Concluding Remarks

MoF Reg. 113/2025 reflects a measured refinement of Indonesia’s excise administration by preserving the substantive grounds for excise refunds, while providing greater procedural clarity on how such refunds may be claimed, evidenced, and applied, including through electronic filing. Rather than materially expanding the scope of entitlement, the regulation appears primarily to clarify the regulatory framework surrounding that entitlement, including who may apply, in what circumstances, on the basis of which documents, and subject to what temporal and administrative constraints. For businesses operating in excisable sectors, the regulation accordingly underscores the practical importance of compliance, since the success of an excise refund claim may depend not only on the existence of a qualifying event, but also on the claimant’s ability to demonstrate procedural accuracy, documentary completeness, and alignment with the statutory mechanism prescribed by DGoCE.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More