ARTICLE
22 September 2025

A Debt Under An Unrecognized Foreign Judgment Or Foreign Arbitral Award, Cannot Be A Basis For A Winding Up Petition Or A Bankruptcy Petition

SP
Soteris Pittas & Co

Contributor

Soteris Pittas & Co LLC is a boutique law firm, in size only, focusing on the areas of law related to business activity and dedicated to providing its clients with outstanding, highly personalized, legal representation.

The lawyers and associates of the firm with their combined skills-set and knowledge can provide comprehensive legal solutions according to the clients’ particular business needs, requirements and objectives. We are committed to representing our clients at all stages of disputes, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation, in order to secure just compensation and legal vindication.

In the recent English Appellate decision in SERVIS TERMINAL LLC -V- DRELLE (2025) EWCA CIV 62, it has been held that a foreign judgment which has not been recognized...
Cyprus Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent English Appellate decision in SERVIS TERMINAL LLC -V- DRELLE (2025) EWCA CIV 62, it has been held that a foreign judgment which has not been recognized and enforced in England, cannot be used, as a basis for the filing of any bankruptcy petition – (including a winding up petition) – on the ground that the sum awarded as per the foreign judgment, is liquidated, undisputed and payable.

It shall be noted that ten years (10) ago, the Cypriot Appellate Court adopted the same principles in the case INTERPARTEMENTAL CONCERN OAO URALMETROM -V- BESUNO (2014) 1 AAD 427, in which inter alia decided:

(a) That a foreign arbitration award – (including a foreign judgment), does not have any legal effect in the Republic of Cyprus, until same is recognized and enforced in Cyprus as per the provisions of NYC.

(b) To dismiss the winding up petition based on the sum awarded under the foreign arbitral award, because such a petition could not be presented on the strength of such unregistered arbitral award.

The principles laid down in Interpartemental -v- Besuno (supra), have been followed and adopted in many 1st Instance Cypriot cases and they have been also re-affirmed by the Appellate Court in the case ONEMIX GROUP MANAGEMENT LTD -V- ROSTEX ENTERPRISES LTD (Civil Appeal 116/2015 – Decision dated 31/1/2024).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More