ARTICLE
14 August 2017

Cayman Court Reaffirms Interim Payments In Merger Dissents

MG
Maples Group

Contributor

The Maples Group is a leading service provider offering clients a comprehensive range of legal services on the laws of the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Ireland, Jersey and Luxembourg, and is an independent provider of fiduciary, fund services, regulatory and compliance, and entity formation and management services.
Pursuant to s.238 of the Cayman Islands Companies Law (2016 Revision), shareholders who are dissatisfied with the price they receive for their shares in a merger are often entitled to dissent...
Cayman Islands Corporate/Commercial Law

Pursuant to s.238 of the Cayman Islands Companies Law (2016 Revision), shareholders who are dissatisfied with the price they receive for their shares in a merger are often entitled to dissent and to have the "fair value" of their shares determined by the Grand Court.  

The jurisprudence surrounding this relatively new species of proceedings continues to evolve at a rapid rate.  In the most recent installment, the Court has reaffirmed its jurisdiction to award dissenters an interim payment early in the proceedings, in the amount for which they are likely to succeed at trial (in this case, the merger price, on the basis that the company had effectively affirmed that it represented the fair value of the shares).  

That is significant for would-be dissenters, as it means they do not have to wait until the end of the litigation to receive a significant payment.  The full text of Mangatal J's decision in Re Qunar Cayman Islands Limited (26 June 2017) can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More