ARTICLE
27 June 2016

Jail Time And Hefty Fines - Dry Cleaners Hit Hard By The Environmental Enforcement Act

WS
Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP

Contributor

Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP logo
Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP www.willmsshier.com is Canada’s recognized leading environmental law firm, delivering a full range of environmental, Indigenous and energy law services. For 40 years, our clients have benefitted from our innovative, practical solutions and extensive knowledge of environmental, Indigenous, and energy and natural resource issues.  With 19 highly specialized lawyers, we are the largest private sector environmental law practice in Canada.  Seven of our lawyers are Environmental Law Specialists, certified by the Law Society of Ontario. Willms & Shier has offices in Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary and Yellowknife.  Our lawyers are called to the Bar in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nunavut, the Northwest Territories, and Ontario.
Second and subsequent offences can result in double fines. If convicted, directors and officers of corporations can be subject to the same fines as the corporations themselves under CEPA.
Canada Environment

Environment and Climate Change Canada has used updated legislation to crack down and levy large fines on non-compliant dry cleaners. Convicted dry cleaners have faced fines ranging from $9,500 to $60,000 regardless of their prior history of compliance with the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA). One dry cleaner has even been sentenced to jail time for non-compliance with the Tetrachloroethylene Regulations.

In 2012, the Environmental Enforcement Act (EEA) amended the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) to impose tougher punishments on certain contraventions of CEPA, including contravention under the Tetrachloroethylene Regulations. As a result, designated serious offences carry heftier fine ranges with mandatory minimum fines. (See chart.)

Second and subsequent offences can result in double fines. If convicted, directors and officers of corporations can be subject to the same fines as the corporations themselves under CEPA.

In addition to changes to the fine scheme, the EEA also increases the limitation period for Environment and Climate Change Canada to institute summary proceedings from two to five years.

RECENT CASES

Since June 2012, several dry cleaning companies have been prosecuted for offences under CEPA that carry the elevated penalties prescribed by the EEA. For example:

  • In 2013, a dry cleaning company was fined $60,000 for multiple offences including improper storage and containment of tetrachloroethylene waste water and residue.
  • In 2014, a dry cleaning company was fined $9,500 for improper storage of tetrachloroethylene and for not having proper secondary containment present.
  • In 2015, a dry cleaning company was fined $25,000 for improper storage of tetrachloroethylene.

New Fine Scheme under the Environmental Enforcement Act

*Small Revenue Corporations are considered to be corporations with revenues under $5,000,000 in the 12 months preceding the offence in question.

  • In 2016, a dry cleaning company was fined $36,000 for improper storage and disposal of tetrachloroethylene.

DIRECTORS IN THE HOT SEAT

Companies are not the only target for Environment and Climate Change Canada prosecutions. Directors and officers also attract liability under the new legislative framework. For example:

  • In 2013, the director of a dry cleaning company was personally fined $10,000 for his corporation's improper storage and containment of tetrachloroethylene.
  • In 2015, the director of a dry cleaning company was personally fined $15,000 for his corporation's improper storage of tetrachloroethylene and absence of tetrachloroethylene- resistant drain plugs.

JAIL SENTENCE

Fines are not the only penalties being sought by Environment and Climate Change Canada.

In February 2016, for the first time ever, the owner of a dry cleaning facility received a four-month conditional jail sentence after pleading guilty to contraventions of the Tetrachloroethylene Regulations. Dry cleaning businesses operated by the owner had been subject to two previous convictions under CEPA. Environment and Climate Change Canada investigations over the course of 14 months found improper storage and handling of tetrachloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene waste. In deciding that a jail sentence was appropriate, the Court focused on the owner's repeated non-compliance despite being made aware of the regulations and the dangers of mishandling tetrachloroethylene.

Other dry cleaning companies, and their directors and officers, have also been charged but have negotiated out of court settlements where the charges were not pursued in exchange for negotiated terms. Negotiated terms included attendance at education seminars on dry cleaning operations, posting public notices of non-compliance and proper handling practices, and payment to the Environmental Damages Fund.

CONCLUSION

Environment and Climate Change Canada is actively prosecuting dry cleaners for contraventions of CEPA and is seeking the increased penalties prescribed by the EEA for convictions. A strong message is being sent by the Court – regulatory compliance must be taken seriously. If not, penalties can deprive you not only of your business profits, but potentially your freedom.

All dry cleaners should take the time to protect themselves and their operations by refreshing their memories about the requirements for their operations under CEPA, the Tetrachloroethylene Regulations, provincial laws and municipal bylaws, and ensuring all aspects of the dry cleaning facilities and operations are in compliance.

Originally published in Fabricare Canada magazine.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More