ARTICLE
9 May 2025

To Agree Or Not To Agree To Settlements In Federal Court

OW
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP

Contributor

Oyen Wiggs LLP is a Vancouver-based independent intellectual property boutique law firm in Canada. We are experienced patent lawyers with a variety of technical backgrounds that provide us with the insight to help our clients define and protect their innovations. Through our wide-reaching network of foreign associates, we advance our clients’ interests around the world.
The Federal Court recently issued a decision in the case of Aria Vent Inc. v. 2213785 Ontario Inc. and TRM Holdings Inc., 2025 FC 672...
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Federal Court recently issued a decision in the case of Aria Vent Inc. v. 2213785 Ontario Inc. and TRM Holdings Inc., 2025 FC 672 that reinforces the importance of carefully handling settlement negotiations.

After the breakdown of settlement negotiations, the defendants sought an order from the Federal Court to enforce a settlement agreement between the parties based on the settlement negotiations.

The Federal Court found that despite the defendants' having attempted to pay the agreed settlement amount, the defendants' failed to "unequivocally" accept other non-monetary essential terms of the settlement.

This case should serve as a reminder to litigants that the Federal Court can declare that a settlement has been reached in the absence of an executed settlement agreement, but that the Federal Court will only do so when acceptance of all essential terms of the settlement agreement can been demonstrated.

Click here to read the full decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More