On July 13, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) unanimously reaffirmed that a corporation's directors may be personally liable in an oppression action, and set out the criteria for imposing personal liability. In Wilson v. Alharayeri, 2017 SCC 39, the SCC confirmed that the two-pronged test from Budd v. Gentra Inc., 1998, 43 B.L.R. (2d) 27 should be used, and elaborated on its application.
The first prong requires the oppressive conduct to be attributable to the individual director.
The second prong requires an analysis of four principles used to determine whether or not the imposition of personal liability is appropriate in the given circumstances.
- A personal remedy must be "fair", with fairness being determined by the presence of several indicia, including whether:
- the directors obtained a personal benefit from their conduct,
- the directors' conduct increased their personal control of the corporation,
- the directors breached a personal duty as a director,
- the directors' corporate power was misused, and
- if a remedy against the corporation would prejudice other security holders.
Although personal benefit and increased personal control are hallmarks of conduct attracting personal liability, neither are necessary conditions. Similarly, while bad faith is not required, it also remains an important consideration.
- The personal remedy should only rectify the injustice between the parties and nothing more.
- As in all oppression actions, the order may only vindicate the reasonable expectations that the aggrieved party held in their capacity as corporate stakeholders.
- Finally, the court should consider the corporate law context in exercising its remedial discretion pursuant to section 241(3), whereby an order cannot be a substitute for other appropriate forms of relief.
The case is significant, as it provides the clearest guidance yet to directors as to when they can face personal liability for corporate oppression. Case law following Budd v. Gentra had gone in several directions, and this case provides a unified national approach to this issue.
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.