ARTICLE
30 November 2023

FCA Dismisses Appeal, Patent Not Listable Against STELARA SNDS

SB
Smart & Biggar

Contributor

Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
As previously reported, the Federal Court (FC) dismissed Janssen's application for judicial review of the decision of the Office of Submissions and Intellectual Property (OSIP) refusing to list...
Canada Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As previously reported, the Federal Court (FC) dismissed Janssen's application for judicial review of the decision of the Office of Submissions and Intellectual Property (OSIP) refusing to list Canadian Patent No. 3,113,837 on the Patent Register with respect to two supplementary new drug submissions (SNDSs) for Janssen's STELARA (ustekinumab). On November 21, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Janssen's appeal: Janssen Inc v Canada (Health), 2023 FCA 229.

Janssen appealed the decision in respect of SNDS 224739 (739 submission). OSIP had determined that:

  1. the patent list for another submission that was submitted within the 30-day deadline did not relate to the 739 submission, and;
  2. a submission that did mention the 739 submission was outside of the 30-day period contemplated by subsection 4(6) of the Patented Medicines Notice of Compliance Regulations (Regulations).

In a brief decision delivered from the bench, the FCA dismissed the appeal, finding that there was no reviewable error in OSIP's decision to refuse to add a previously submitted patent list against the 739 submission. The FCA also stated that Janssen could not add a different SNDS to an existing patent list under the guise of keeping information on the patent list up to date pursuant to subsection 4(7) of the Regulations.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More