ARTICLE
25 September 2019

You Get What You Give – Court Confirms It Is Appropriate To Provide Part-Time Benefits When Accommodated Employee Works In A Part-Time Position

C
CCPartners

Contributor

Workplace issues are complex, involving real people and difficult decisions. CCPartners is focused on providing exceptional service with a tailored approach to employers across all areas of Labour and Employment Law. We take the time to ask the right questions, understand your business, and help you achieve the outcomes that support your business goals.
By now most employers know (or should know) that accommodation is a difficult process to navigate. One of the challenges that employers
Canada Employment and HR

By now most employers know (or should know) that accommodation is a difficult process to navigate. One of the challenges that employers must address is how to appropriately compensate an employee who is being accommodated in a different position. This question only gets more complicate when the employee in question has changed status, such as full-time to part-time, as part of the accommodation process. The Divisional Court provided direction for employers in the recent decision of City of Toronto v Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79.

The Court reviewed a decision of an arbitrator which found that it was a breach of the Ontario Human Rights Code (“OHRC”) for the Employer to only provide part-time benefits to an employee who was being accommodated with part time work but who usually worked full-time. Like many workplaces – in this case part-time benefits were different from full-time benefits, including not having short term disability and long term disability coverage. The approach of the Employer in this case was to pay the employee for the work he was actually performing which included adjusting his benefit package to reflect his change in status to part-time.

The good news for employers is that the Court determined that the arbitrator’s decision was unreasonable and directed that the grievance should be dismissed. The Court confirmed that an employer does not discriminate or breach the OHRC by failing to provide the added benefits that a full-time employee is entitled to when a person is working part-time hours – even if the change in status is due to a disability. This distinction is acceptable under the OHRC because the different treatment is based on the different level of work e.g. full-time versus part-time and is not based on disability.

When navigating the accommodation process employers should keep in mind that it remains the case that there is a requirement for the employee to provide work in return for compensation which includes working full-time in order to receive full-time benefits. Despite this positive decision, employers should continue to be cautious in adjusting terms of employment as part of the accommodation process. The lawyers at CCPartners can help you navigate the entire accommodation process- including when changes to employment status may be necessary.

Click here to access CCPartners’ “Lawyers for Employers” podcasts on important workplace issues and developments in labour and employment law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More