ARTICLE
25 April 2016

Good Faith And Reasonableness: Two Limits On Canadian Freedom of Contract

TM
Torkin Manes LLP

Contributor

Torkin Manes LLP is a full service, mid-sized law firm based in downtown Toronto. Our clientele ranges from public and private corporations, to financial institutions, to professional practices, to individuals. We have built our firm from the ground up—by understanding our clients’ business needs, being results-oriented, practical, smart, cost-effective and responsive.
The ideas of good faith and reasonableness have informed the Canadian common law's approach to contract law for many years.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law

The ideas of good faith and reasonableness have informed the Canadian common law's approach to contract law for many years. Despite the importance of these two principles, however, Canadian courts have struggled to determine their scope and application. 

The approach of Canadian courts generally has been to impose minimal requirements on parties to a contract not to act arbitrarily and capriciously. Using the language of good faith and reasonableness, the courts have attempted to strike a balance between freedom of contract and the law's imposition of minimal behavioral requirements on all contracting parties.

Read more

Originally published by Business Law Today

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More