ARTICLE
20 January 2025

Comments On Competition Bureau's Consultation On Its Merger Enforcement Guidelines

DW
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg

Contributor

Davies is a law firm focused on high-stakes matters. Committed to achieving superior outcomes for our clients, we are consistently at the heart of their most complex deals and cases. With offices in Toronto, Montréal and New York, our capabilities extend seamlessly to every continent. Visit us at www.dwpv.com.
Davies recently submitted comments in response to consultations initiated by the Canadian Competition Bureau's November 7, 2024 Discussion Paper on the Bureau's review of its Merger Enforcement Guidelines (MEGs)...
Canada Antitrust/Competition Law

Davies recently submitted comments in response to consultations initiated by the Canadian Competition Bureau's November 7, 2024 Discussion Paper on the Bureau's review of its Merger Enforcement Guidelines (MEGs) to better reflect recent changes to the Competition Act as well as the Bureau's current practices.

The comment letter, prepared by John Bodrug and Anita Banicevic, commends the Bureau for its initiative to update the MEGs and seek public comments on potential revisions, particularly revisions to address changes in the Bureau's practice arising from recent extensive amendments to the Competition Act. (See our notes on these amendments here and here.) Among other things, Davies' comments encourage the Bureau to:

  1. provide guidance on what influences the Competition Bureau to clear, not just to challenge, a merger;
  2. clarify the significance of a merger exceeding the new concentration and market share threshold that can give rise to presumed anti-competitive effects, and address the types of evidence that may overcome such a presumption;
  3. recognize that market definition and determination of market shares should reflect commercial reality and take into account all factors (including supply side responses) that are relevant to identifying the possibility of exercising market power;
  4. recognize that efficiencies remain a relevant factor in merger reviews; and
  5. clarify the Bureau's views on how it expects to analyze a merger's impact on labour markets.

Download the comments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More