Normative Instruction RFB No. 2,205/2024: Regulation Of The Effects Applicable To Cases Decided By CARF By Casting Vote

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On July 24, 2024, Normative Instruction No. 2,205/ of the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service (the "Instruction") was published, that regulates Article 25, paragraph 9-A, and Article 25-A of Decree No. 70
Brazil Tax

On July 24, 2024, Normative Instruction No. 2,205/ of the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service (the "Instruction") was published, that regulates Article 25, paragraph 9-A, and Article 25-A of Decree No. 70,235/1972, establishing possibilities and manner for the exclusion of penalties, cancellation of the Tax Representation for Criminal Purposes ("RFFP"), and the regularization of tax debts, applicable to administrative tax proceedings resulting from a final decision favorable to the Federal Government, issued by the Taxpayers Council of Administrative Appeals ("CARF") through a casting vote.

Following the interpretation given by the Office of Attorney-General of the National Treasury ("PGFN") to Article 25-A of Decree No. 70,235/1972 under SEI Opinion No. 943/2024/MF, the Instruction rules that not every penalty can be excluded  in the event of a definitive decision by CARF by casting vote, but only the following penalties set out in Law No. 9,430/1996:

(i) the entire penalty for the tax assessment mentioned in Article 44, caput, item I, if the main tax credit is maintained by the casting vote;

(ii) the isolated penalty referred to in Article 44, caput, item II, provided that there is a specific decision, by casting vote, regarding its maintenance;

(iii) increase of the penalty referred to in Article 44, paragraph 1, item VI, if maintained by casting vote, with the penalty referred to in Article 44, caput, item I being preserved;

(iv) increase of the penalty referred to in Article 44, paragraph 1, item VII, if maintained by casting vote, preserving the increase referred to in Article 44, paragraph 1, item VI, and the RFFP; and

(v) the increase of the penalty referred to in Article 44, paragraph 2, if maintained by a casting vote.

On the other hand, even if decided by a casting vote, the exclusion of the penalty and cancellation of the RFFP will not apply if the matter before the court relates to (i) isolated penalties (with the exception of the bases mentioned above); (ii) late payment penalties; (iii) customs penalties; (iv) tax liability; (v) the existence of a taxpayer's credit claim; or (vi) statutes of limitations.

To enjoy the effects of the Instruction, a taxpayer must file the request within 90 days of the notification of the "final" result rendered by CARF. During this term, the tax liability will be suspended.

The exclusion of penalties and the cancellation of the RFFP do not apply to decisions rendered by the CARF which became final before January 12, 2023.

The tax credits can be paid in up to 12 successive monthly installments, with a 100% reduction in interest on arrears. The request must be accompanied by payment of either the entire debt or the first installment.

It is worth noting that: (i) these conditions will not be cumulative with other reductions established by law; and (ii) these credits may be paid by using writs of payment ("precatório") as well as credits arising from tax loss and negative Social Contribution on Net Profit (CSLL) calculation basis, determined prior to the submission of the request.

Furthermore, the Instruction provides that submitting such a request implies the irrevocable and irreversible extrajudicial confession of the debt.

Finally, it should be remembered that this is not the first time that the Brazilian IRS has dealt with this theme, since IN RFB No. 2,167/2023 already regulated some of the aspects related to the operationalization of the benefits granted by Law No. 14,689/2023 (the "CARF Law"). However, IN RFB No. 2,167/2023 was revoked by the Instruction. To that end, the Instruction clarified some concerns raised by taxpayers at the time of IN RFB No. 2,167/2023's publication, as well as following PGFN's understanding in SEI Opinion No. 943/2024/MF, published earlier this year.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More