On 21 June 2018, Commonwealth regulations have been made providing for a range of contracts to be excluded from the stay on the exercise of "ispo facto" provisions.
A number of these exceptions are important to public private partnerships, infrastructure projects over $1 billion, infrastructure financed using project finance and projects in the public health, national defence and critical government ICT sectors.
Need to know:
- The ipso facto stay provisions will take effect on 1 July 2018. Unless one of the exclusions apply, these provisions will have wide ranging effect on all contracts, agreement, or arrangements entered into on or after 1 July 2018.
- The Corporations Amendment (Stay on Enforcing Certain Rights) Regulations 2018 (Regulations) specify types of contracts which will be excluded from the ipso facto stay provisions.
From 1 July 2018, amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) will come into effect which stay the enforcement of ipso facto clauses in a contract.What are ipso facto clauses?
The term 'ipso facto' is generally used to describe a clause in a contract which allows one party to terminate a contract on the basis of a proscribed insolvency event occurring, such as the company entering into voluntary administration or receivership.
Numerous types of contracts contain clauses of this nature, but construction, supply, operation and maintenance contracts are among the most common examples.
The amendments impose a stay on the exercise of a right to terminate a contract merely as a consequence of:
- the appointment of a voluntary administrator;
- the appointment of a receiver or controller; or
- the proposal of a scheme of arrangement.
Other termination rights which may exist are not disrupted and parties will continue to be able to terminate contracts on other grounds, such as default in payment or non-performance. The insolvent counterparty must be able to continue to perform the contract regardless of the insolvency event.
The period covered by the stay will vary depending on the type of insolvency process, but will generally commence on the date the company comes under external administration and end on the date when the administration or receivership ends, in accordance with a court order or when the company is wound up.
WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTIONS MOST RELEVANT TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS?
The types of contracts which have been excluded from the ipso facto stay provisions are set out in full in Schedule 1 to the Regulations. Most of the exceptions are targeted at finance arrangements. However, there are important exceptions which are relevant to infrastructure projects. These include a contract, agreement or arrangement:
- for defined building work entered into between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2023 if the total payments are at least $1 billion - together with contracts, agreements or arrangements, such as subcontracts, to enable satisfactory completion of such a head building work contract;
- involving a special purpose vehicle that provides for a public- private partnership or project finance;
- for supply of goods or services to, or on behalf of, a public hospital or public health service;
- for the supply of essential or critical information technology, or communications technology, products or services to government, government authorities or to the public on behalf of government;
- relating to Australia's defence capability; and
- entered into or renewed on or after 1 July 2018 but before 30 June 2023 as a result of the novation, assignment or variation of a contract, agreement or arrangement entered into prior to 1 July 2018.
IMPACT FOR PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
The exclusion for building contracts with total payments over $1 billion provides important comfort for some of Australia's large scale and complex construction contracts and preserves important protections for the parties involved in managing counter-party credit risk. Query why government does not see as necessary an exclusion for construction contracts which come in below the $1 billion threshold but are still large, complex and negotiated between sophisticated parties. Note that because of the way building work is defined, the exception does not extend to contracts for drilling for oil or natural gas or the extraction of minerals.
The exclusions for public-private partnerships and project finance are also important given the critical role party credit risk plays in structuring these arrangements. Parties will need to review the wording of the particular regulations closely to ensure their transactions are structured so as to fall within the exclusions.
The sector specific exclusions for public health, national defence and critical ITC will be important for contracts involving those sectors.
There remain, however, a wide range of infrastructure projects and significant construction, supply, operations and maintenance arrangements which do not benefit from the exceptions and will be fully impacted by the ipso facto stay provisions.
WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?
We recommend you should review your contracts and agreements and consider whether they are captured by the ipso facto stay provisions or whether they fall within an exception. This applies to governments, principals and financiers with exposure to the credit risk of contractors and suppliers as much as it does to contractors exposed to the credit risk of subcontractors or principals.
If relying on an exception, careful consideration will be needed of the detailed wording of each exception to make sure you fall within its ambit. The language of the exceptions is open to interpretation and, as they are new, we do not yet have the benefit of any judicial guidance on the meaning of these regulations - nor should any be expected for some time.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
|Chambers Asia Pacific Awards 2016 Winner
Client Service Award
|Employer of Choice for Gender Equality