An employee has been absent on a number of occasions. The medical certificates state that the employee is suffering from a "medical condition". The workplace relies on that employee to function as a member of a team and his/her absences are impacting on the work being done and their colleagues. The employee does not provide any further information about his/her medical condition. Can you require the employee to submit to a medical examination and what happens if the employee refuses?


Often, the first step is for an employer to ask, and if necessary, direct the employee to undergo a medical examination. Where the employee refuses, the employer needs to decide whether that direction will stand up and what the consequences of that direction are (that is, can the employer dismiss the employee?).

Typically, the employee will challenge the employer's right to give that direction by alleging that such a direction is not a lawful or reasonable direction or that it amounts to disability discrimination or adverse action because it constitutes a "detriment" in employment and the detriment is due to the disability.


In employment contracts, employers can give lawful and reasonable directions to their employees and employees are required to comply with those lawful and reasonable directions.

It is generally lawful and reasonable to direct an employee to attend a medical examination to determine whether the employee is fit to perform his or her duties and whether he or she can do so safely. This follows from an employer's duty under occupational health and safety legislation in Australia. Typically, this situation will involve employees with disabilities within the meaning of discrimination legislation, which may give rise to potential breaches of that legislation.

However, discrimination legislation does not make all disability discrimination unlawful. For example, it is not unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee due to the employee's disability if the disability prevents the employee from safely carrying out the inherent requirements of his or her work (even after reasonable adjustments or accommodation is made). Therefore, focusing on the disability as it affects the work and its safety is not necessarily unlawful discrimination.

Where the direction to undergo a medical examination is lawful and reasonable, the employee will not have suffered a "detriment" in employment and therefore the requirement to undergo a medical examination cannot constitute unlawful disability discrimination or adverse action. In that case, the direction can give rise to a valid reason to dismiss the employee.


Employers cannot randomly or routinely require employees to undergo medical examinations on occupational health and safety grounds, even if they have been absent due to illness. What makes such a direction lawful and reasonable is two-fold:

  • The existence of circumstances that genuinely justify a need for a medical examination for the particular employee
  • The setting of reasonable terms for the requirement to undergo a medical examination.

Employers will be able to show there was a genuine need for a medical examination when the following types of factors exist:

  • Frequent, lengthy or many unexplained absences from work or inability to perform the work or its inherent characteristics, particularly where information about the employee's medical condition, or its impact on the work, is unknown.
  • Where the medical condition is known broadly (eg a back injury) and the nature of the work the employee is required to perform is likely to be affected by such an injury.
  • Inconsistencies in information available to the employer about the employee's state of health.
  • Genuine concerns raised by other employees about an employee's fitness for work.

The terms of the medical examination will be reasonable where:

  • The medical examination's focus is on the inherent requirements of the work, occupational health and safety obligations and fitness for work generally.
  • An appropriate medical expert is arranged to conduct the medical examination.
  • The employee is advised of the reasons for the medical examination.
  • Privacy and confidentiality in the process is maintained as far as possible.
  • The process is conducted in a sensitive manner.

Employers should therefore only require a medical examination when there is a genuine issue with the employee being able to safely do their job and the employer must also conduct the process carefully and sensitively.

If an employee refuses a reasonable and lawful direction to undertake a medical examination, an employer may be entitled to dismiss the employee for failure to follow that direction, without breaching adverse action, unfair dismissal or discrimination laws. This is subject to procedural requirements, including that the employee is aware of the possibility of dismissal.


Of course, when the employee attends the medical examination, the information or opinion provided by the medical expert will need to be acted upon by the employer.

If the medical expert confirms the employee can do their job safely, an employer then risks a disability discrimination or unfair/unlawful termination claim if they nevertheless dismiss the employee or prevent them doing that job. This risk includes circumstances in which the expert states the employee can perform the role safely, but with reasonable adjustment or assistance, or, in some cases, if they can do so on a part-time basis rather than full-time, or if they cannot do the job currently but may be able to do so in the short term.

If the expert supports a conclusion that the employee cannot safely perform the inherent requirements of the role, grounds may exist to validly dismiss the employee, without breaching discrimination, unlawful termination or unfair dismissal laws (subject to proper processes being followed). However, the employer needs to consider whether the incapacity is such that dismissal can be justified.


Have you considered obtaining consent from the employee to speak to his/her treating doctor?

If the employee does not consent, have you directed him/her to undergo an independent medical assessment?

Is the independent medical practitioner an appropriate specialist to assess the worker's work capacity?

Have you ensured confidentiality and sensitivity is maintained as far as possible in requiring that independent examination?

If the employee refuses the direction, are you in a position to proceed to dismiss the employee for failure to follow a lawful and reasonable direction?

Have you provided the independent medical practitioner (or treating doctor, if requesting his/her opinion) with a description of the employee's pre-injury duties, noting the inherent requirements of the position?

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to