ARTICLE
24 August 2025

Safety-net Changes For Degree-qualified Workers: When Something You Didn't Know About Can Hurt You

PA
Piper Alderman

Contributor

A premier commercial law firm, Piper Alderman has offices in Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney. We work with clients across Australia and internationally to achieve optimum legal and commercial solutions. Our legal expertise has been built on nearly two centuries of industry experience. Piper Alderman has been a leading advisor to Australian commercial interests for more than 170 years and we continue to advance in knowledge, skills and commitment. We listen to our clients, respond to their needs and guide them through increasingly complex regulatory and business landscapes.
Fair Work Commission to take into account the need to achieve gender equality in the workplace and eliminating gender-based undervaluation.
Australia Employment and HR

Modern awards create enforceable obligations on employers and are not overridden by contract terms.

The process for bringing about changes to modern awards has been supercharged by an active and ongoing process of award review initiated by the Fair Work Commission, including for gender based undervaluation. The Commission's process is not widely published, and is easy to miss in circumstances where any resulting changes have potentially significant impacts on pay and conditions.

Employers who wish to have a say in the variation process need to actively involve themselves either directly or through employer associations. The latest iteration of this process is over employment conditions for degree-qualified workers.

Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) require the Fair Work Commission to take into account the need to achieve gender equality in the workplace and eliminating gender-based undervaluation. The Commission has first focussed on significantly feminised industries and has included significant research into gender-based undervaluation in employment. At the same time, individual applications have been filed seeking increases to wages under particular awards which have been found to be most exposed to gender-based undervaluation.

The Commission is not leaving gender undervaluation relating to modern award minimum wage rates to be dealt with on an application-by-application basis outside a wider framework. Subsequent reviews have been making their way through the Commission process.

The most recent development following the annual wage review has been the Commission's announcement of review into degree-qualified workers. As the Commission's research indicated:

"Professional occupations, considered as a whole, are majority female (55.4 per cent). However, a much higher proportion — 69.7 per cent — of modern award-reliant professionals are female. This surpasses the threshold of 60 per cent female identified for feminised occupations in the Priority Awards Review decision and makes clear that the detriment of non alignment with the C1(a) benchmark rate principally accrues to female professionals."1

The C1(a) benchmark referred to is currently $1525.90 per week. The Commission has noted that a guiding principle is that the benchmark should as a minimum, apply to any classification for which a university degree is required.2

Provisional list of awards with classifications to be reviewed

Already touted for review are degree-qualified classifications falling within the below awards:

Airport Employees Award 2020 Higher Education Industry—General Staff—Award 2020
Ambulance and Patient Transport Industry Award 2020 Hydrocarbons Field Geologists Award 2020
Animal Care and Veterinary Services Award 2020 Legal Services Award 2020
Architects Award 2020 Live Performance Award 2020
Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2020 Local Government Industry Award 2020
Book Industry Award 2020 Medical Practitioners Award 2020
Broadcasting and Recorded Entertainment Award 2020 Professional Employees Award 2020
Educational Services (Post-Secondary Education) Award 2020 Rail Industry Award 2020
Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award 2020 State Government Agencies Award 2020
Electrical Power Industry Award 2020 Surveying Award 2020
Higher Education Industry—Academic Staff—Award 2020 Water Industry Award 2020

The full list of classifications provisionally to be included in the review can be found here: Provisional classifications list

Classifications requiring a diploma qualification may also form part of the review and given the expansive nature of the provisional review, it is more likely than not that this will be the case, especially if there are interested parties seeking their inclusion.

Employers with degree or diploma qualified workers should consider whether they ought to be involved in the review process. Early involvement in these review proceedings places employers in the best position to have their interests represented.


Footnotes:

1 [2025] FWCFB 3500 [82]
2 [2025] FWCFB 74

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More