ARTICLE
21 October 2018

SEC Continues Scrutiny Of Non-GAAP Measures

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
In past quarterly updates of this memorandum, we have discussed the increased scrutiny with which the SEC has been reviewing companies' use of non-GAAP financial measures, which are financial measures...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

In past quarterly updates of this memorandum, we have discussed the increased scrutiny with which the SEC has been reviewing companies' use of non-GAAP financial measures, which are financial measures that do not conform either to US generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") or international financial reporting standards ("IFRS"), as applicable

Since the SEC's updated its compliance and disclosure interpretations ("C&DIs") regarding the use of non-GAAP financial measures in May 2016 it has continued to focus on this topic and has to date publicly released approximately 300 comment letters dealing with misuses of non-GAAP measures. In addition to those areas discussed in past newsletters, recent comment letters have focused on:

  • Inadequate presentation of tax effects on non-GAAP measures: the SEC frequently asks issuers to avoid presenting the required reconciliations from GAAP net of tax, asking instead for presentation of the income tax effect as a separate line item, with an explanation of the calculation if necessary.
  • Individually tailored accounting principles: while non-GAAP measures by definition are not bound to accounting principles, the SEC has indicated that individually tailored application of accounting principles to non-GAAP measures may be misleading. Examples include only removing portions of depreciation expense, deferring revenue and costs, adjusting assets for proportionate economic ownership and adjusting weighted average common shares.
  • Use of per share liquidity measures: the use of per share liquidity measures is generally prohibited, but recent SEC comments indicate they are examining per share non-GAAP measures to examine if they are in substance per share liquidity measures, and are used by investors as such, rather than permitted per share performance measures. Importantly for companies, EBITDA and EBIT are not permitted be presented on a per share basis.

Our client publication describing trends in the first 150 comment letters is available at:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More