ARTICLE
9 November 2017

Colorado Court Of Appeals Rules Out-Of-State Holding Company Cannot Be Forcibly Included In A Colorado Combined Return

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
The Colorado Court of Appeals, affirming a decision of the Denver District Court, has held that the Colorado Department of Revenue cannot forcibly combine a corporation's subsidiary...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Colorado Court of Appeals, affirming a decision of the Denver District Court, has held that the Colorado Department of Revenue cannot forcibly combine a corporation's subsidiary, a holding company that derived its income solely from investments in foreign entities, in Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado, et al. (Nov. 2, 2017). The appellate court held that the application of the Department of Revenue's regulation, which provides that a corporation without any property or payroll of its own cannot be included in a Colorado combined return, was not limited to foreign sales corporations. The court also ruled that neither a Colorado anti-abuse statute, nor the economic substance doctrine, gave the Department the authority to include the subsidiary in its parent's combined return.

Read a copy of the decision.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More