The Name Game: Practical Branding Tips For Robotics Companies

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
As robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to grow, businesses in this field face the challenge of how they should name their new technologies.
United States Intellectual Property

As robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to grow, businesses in this field face the challenge of how they should name their new technologies. Moreover, as part of this naming process, these businesses must decide whether the name that they have chosen will be (a) their exclusive brand/trademark, or (b) a generic term for their new technology that will enter the public's vocabulary. Failure to distinguish between trademarks and generic names can lead to significant branding problems later making it impossible to distinguish a business's product or service from that of its competitors. In this article, Finnegan attorneys Brett Heavner and Yinfei Wu identify common trademark pitfalls that robotics companies face and provide practical tips for avoiding them.

Read the full article here

Originally published by The Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More