ARTICLE
27 March 2023

Federal Government Is Not Powerless To Stop Chinese Real Estate Deals Near Sensitive Us Military Bases

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

Is the U.S. government unprepared to respond to a Chinese company purchasing land near a vital military base? The Air Force recently wrote Congress to explain that the interagency...
United States Government, Public Sector

This article was originally published in The Hill. Reprinted with permission. Any opinions in this article are not those of Winston & Strawn or its clients. The opinions in this article are the author's opinions only.

Is the U.S. government unprepared to respond to a Chinese company purchasing land near a vital military base? The Air Force recently wrote Congress to explain that the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) lacked jurisdiction over just such a deal. The Chinese company sought to build a corn processing plant 12 miles from North Dakota's Grand Forks Air Force Base. According to the Air Force, the base "is the center of military activities related to both air and space operations," and the "proposed project presents a significant threat to national security with both near- and long-term risks of significant impacts to our operations in the area." Given that the exclusive mission of CFIUS is to address national security risks arising from foreign investments in the United States, what gives?

In 2018, Congress gave CFIUS, chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury, more resources and new authorities — including the express power to review real estate purchases near military bases and other sensitive U.S. government sites. In other words, Congress foresaw the vulnerability of U.S. military bases having Chinese companies as next-door neighbors.

And in 2020, CFIUS issued regulations governing the review of real estate transactions near military bases. The regulations center on two lists of sensitive installations. The first (the "Sensitive Base List") identifies approximately 131 sensitive military bases, such as Joint Base Andrews, MacDill Air Force Base, Camp Pendleton, and Naval Base San Diego. With limited exceptions, CFIUS has jurisdiction over any real estate transactions within one mile of installations on the Sensitive Base List. The second list (the "Highly Sensitive Base List") has approximately 32 highly sensitive military facilities, including Edwards Air Force Base, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, and Yuma Proving Ground. For these bases, CFIUS can intervene in real estate transactions anywhere within 99 miles.

Read the full op-ed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More