ARTICLE
3 October 2025

Telephone And Texting Compliance News — October 2025

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
We are pleased to present our latest edition of Telephone and Texting Compliance News, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

We are pleased to present our latest edition of Telephone and Texting Compliance News, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

In this month's Regulatory Update, we cover three developments highlighting the FCC and FTC's continued efforts to strengthen robocall prevention and telemarketing compliance. First, the FCC is seeking public comment on whether to revise or extend STIR/SHAKEN implementation deadlines for certain providers, and how to assess the framework's effectiveness in combating illegal robocalls. Second, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau removed Chase Tech LLC from the Robocall Mitigation Database for submitting false certification information, reinforcing its commitment to data integrity and compliance enforcement. And third, the FTC announced a fee increase for accessing the National Do-Not-Call Registry, reminding telemarketers of the ongoing costs and legal obligations tied to maintaining compliance with the Telemarketing Sales Rule.

In our Litigation Update, we dive into the recent TCPA decision in Human v. Fisher Investments, where the court denied summary judgment on a fraud counterclaim, citing troubling evidence: disposal of a computer, Fifth Amendment invocations, a phone receiving texts to multiple identities, and over 65 TCPA suits filed by the plaintiff in one year. The case highlights the importance of aggressive discovery and the strategic use of counterclaims against serial litigants.

If you have suggestions for topics you'd like us to feature in this newsletter, or any questions about the content in this issue, please feel free to reach out to an attorney on Mintz's TCPA and Consumer Calling Practice team.

In This Edition

Regulatory Update

Litigation Update

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More