ARTICLE
1 October 2020

New CDI Clarifies The Form S-3 Eligibility Of Companies That Go Public Via Merger Into A SPAC

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
General Instruction I.A.6(a) would not be available because the succession was not primarily for the purpose of changing the state of incorporation of the predecessor or forming a holding company.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

On Sept. 21, 2020, SEC's Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) posted a Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (CDI) regarding restrictions on Form S-3 eligibility for private companies that go public via merger into a reporting shell company (e.g., a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC)) during the 12 calendar months following the business combination. Corp Fin provided clarification with respect to the following categories of registrants:

  1. New entity following the business combination. If the registrant is a new entity following the business combination transaction with a shell company, the registrant would need 12 calendar months of Exchange Act reporting history following the business combination transaction in order to satisfy the Form S-3 eligibility requirement (General Instruction I.A.3) that an issuer have timely filed all periodic reports (Section 13(a) or 15(d) reports and Sections 14(a) and 14(c) materials) during the preceding 12 calendar months.

  2. Successor registrant. If the registrant is a "successor registrant":

    1. General Instruction I.A.6(a) would not be available because the succession was not primarily for the purpose of changing the state of incorporation of the predecessor or forming a holding company.

    2. The private operating company or companies would not have met the registrant requirements to use Form S-3 prior to the succession under General Instruction I.A.6(b); and

  3. Not a new entity or a successor registrant. If the registrant is not a new entity or a "successor registrant," the combined entity would have less than 12 calendar months of post-combination Exchange Act reporting history. Form S-3 is based on the "widespread dissemination to the marketplace" of an issuer's Exchange Act reports over at least a 12-month period. Consequently, in absence of a 12-month history of Exchange Act reporting, SEC's staff would be unlikely to be able to accelerate effectiveness under Section 8(a) of the Securities Act.

SEC's CDI with respect to question 115.18 is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More