ARTICLE
14 February 2025

SEC Statement On Climate-Based Disclosure Rule Provides Insight Into Evolving Disclosure Priorities

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
Over the last few weeks, each of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's members have highlighted the current Commission's views of disclosure by public companies.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Over the last few weeks, each of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's members have highlighted the current Commission's views of disclosure by public companies. On February 11, 2025, Acting Chairman Mark Uyeda's Statement on Climate-Related Disclosure Rules (the "Statement") directly addressed the Commission rulemaking entitled Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors (the "Rule"). The Rule, adopted in March 2024, was immediately the subject of several lawsuits, which were then consolidated in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Effectiveness of the Rule is currently stayed pending completion of the litigation. In the Statement, Acting Chairman Uyeda shared his opinion that "the Rule is deeply flawed and could inflict significant harm on the capital markets and our economy." Acting Chairman Uyeda went on to address his specific concerns, including whether the Commission had statutory authority to adopt the Rule, the need for the Rule, the evaluation of costs and benefits of the Rule, and whether the Commission acted properly under the Administrative Procedure Act when adopting the Rule. Accordingly, and in light of the January 20, 2025 Executive Order freezing regulatory action by federal agencies, Acting Chairman Uyeda stated that he directed the Commission staff to request that the Court refrain from scheduling oral arguments in the case, providing more time for the Commission to determine next steps, of which it will then notify the Court. Notably, the pending litigation has been joined by the attorneys general of several states as intervenors, who may choose to defend the Rule even if the Commission opts for a different approach.

On the same morning, Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw issued her own statement, directly expressing her disagreement with the above. She reiterated her previously-stated beliefs that the Rule is directly responsive to investors' requests for "consistent, comparable, and reliable climate risk disclosures," that must evolve alongside changing world and investment risks. The Commissioner further stated that the "only things that have changed since the Rule was passed have been matters of politics and not substance."

These statements come on the heels of Commissioner Hester Peirce's January 27 remarks at the Northwestern Securities Regulation Institute. Commissioner Peirce shared her own views on the Commission's "limited mission," which can be supported by "fending off efforts to commandeer the SEC's disclosure regime." As examples of disclosure intended to benefit those other than investors, Commissioner Peirce highlighted not only climate-based disclosure, but also recent rules requiring disclosure about conflict minerals and CEO pay ratios. Instead, she stressed the importance of materiality-based disclosure as "one of the foundational strengths of the American securities regulatory regime."

It is unclear what the Commission's next steps will be with respect to the Rule. However its status is resolved, based on the recent public statements, it seems likely that the current Republican-led Commission will continue to support disclosure that is more closely tied to a public company's financial statements, but will likely be less supportive of disclosure requirements that stray further afield. Companies should continue to revisit their disclosure, remembering that, just because the Rule is not currently in effect, other Commission rules continue to require similar climate-risk based disclosure. Read Acting Chairman Uyeda's Statement here, Commissioner Crenshaw's statement here and Commissioner Peirce's remarks here.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2025. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More