How Does The Sequester Affect Energy Programs?

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
On Friday evening, President Obama formally notified the Office of Management and Budget to initiate the sequester, as both sides were unable and/or unwilling to reach an agreement on a plan to avert the automatic across-the-board spending cuts.
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Friday evening, President Obama formally notified the Office of Management and Budget to initiate the sequester, as both sides were unable and/or unwilling to reach an agreement on a plan to avert the automatic across-the-board spending cuts. The sequester affects several notable energy programs. See below for details.

DOE

  • Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program (1703) cut 5% ($2 million from $38 million in FY’13)

  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) cut 5% ($91 million from $1.8 billion)

  • Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA-E) cut 5% ($14 million from $277 million)

  • Fossil Energy Research and Development cut 5% ($25 million from $495 million)

  • Office of Science cut 5% ($245 million from $4.9 billion)

  • Nuclear Energy cut 5% ($39 million from $771 million)

USDA

  • Rural Cooperative Development Grants cut 5% ($1 million from $25 million)

  • Rural Business Program Account cut 5% ($4 million from $75 million)

  • Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) cut 5.1% ($1 million from $25 million)

  • Rural Development Loan Fund Program Account cut 5% ($1 million from $11 million)

  • Energy Assistance Payments cut 5.1% ($3 million from $65 million)

Treasury

  • Grants for Specified Energy Property in Lieu of Tax Credits (Sect. 1603) cut 5.1% ($187 million from $3,671 million)

  • Payment to Issuer of New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds cut 5.1% ($1 million from $24 million)

  • Payment to Issuer of Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds cut 5.1% ($2 million from $32 million)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

How Does The Sequester Affect Energy Programs?

United States Energy and Natural Resources

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More