Last week, the Attorney General of Michigan announced that her office "will begin seeking proposals from attorneys and law firms . . . to pursue litigation related to the climate change impacts caused by the fossil fuel industry on behalf of the State of Michigan." This is a noteworthy development, to say the least.
While climate change tort litigation by state and local governments directed against the fossil fuel industry has been going on for several years--albeit without a successful verdict awarding money damages, as yet--the number of new cases filed has been relatively modest. This dearth of new litigation is likely due to a number of factors, among them that several of the existing cases have been dismissed on various procedural grounds, and thus posing the risk of a significant potential expense that a public entity could incur without reward. This proposal by the Michigan Attorney-General--which would appear to invite contingency fee litigation--may enable state and local governments to pursue this type of litigation without a significant outlay of funds. Further, this proposal may be surfacing at this time as several recent court rulings have limited the procedural roadblocks that, until now, have stymied this litigation pathway.
In short, this action by the Michigan Attorney General may signal a new era of public entity climate change tort litigation against major fossil fuel companies, with an accompanying increase in potential legal liability, and thus greater risks involved in operating that type of business. Indeed, the specter of litigation--even if unsuccessful--may also shape the circumstances by discouraging involvement with the fossil fuel industry.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced the Department
will begin seeking proposals from attorneys and law firms to serve
as Special Assistant Attorneys General to pursue litigation related
to the climate change impacts caused by the fossil fuel industry on
behalf of the State of Michigan. "
Our 'Pure Michigan' identity is under threat from the
effects of climate change," Nessel said. . . .["]Severe
weather events are on the rise. These impacts threaten not only our
way of life but also our economy and pose long-term risks to
Michigan's thriving agribusiness. The fossil fuel industry,
despite knowing about these consequences, prioritized profits over
people and the environment. Pursuing this litigation will allow us
to recoup our costs and hold those responsible for jeopardizing
Michigan's economic future and way of life
accountable."
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.