San Francisco Renews Cert Bid In CWA Case, Citing New EPA Enforcement

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Environmental Law Chair Jeff Porter spoke to Inside EPA on San Francisco urging the Supreme Court to review a split Ninth Circuit decision upholding an EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination...
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Environmental Law Chair Jeff Porter spoke to Inside EPA on San Francisco urging the Supreme Court to review a split Ninth Circuit decision upholding an EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit with narrative standards.

Jeff said, "Until last week the City and County of San Francisco, and the fifteen industry groups and dozen or so water supply and conservation associations supporting them, could only speak of the possibility of 'crushing' 'enforcement.' Now the fact of such enforcement is irrefutable. There may be a compelling reason that EPA absolutely needed to file suit against the City of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act while the United States Supreme Court was deciding whether to hear the City's appeal of a closely related permit issued by EPA to the City and the County under that same Clean Water Act, but I can't for the life of me think of what that reason would be."

SOURCE

Inside EPA

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More